Comparison Overview

Gulf Coast Coil Coatings

VS

Dalkopak

Gulf Coast Coil Coatings

1047 ENE Loop 323, Tyler, Texas, 75708, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Gulf Coast Coil Coatings (GCCC), an affiliate of Houston Plating and Coatings, LLC, (HP&C). HP&C has been the leading provider of coating services to petroleum equipment manufacturing industry for over 20 years. GCCC, is a licensee for the premier HVAC corrosion protection, Heresite® Protective Coating. Now, with the backing of HP&C, GCCC is intent on becoming the leader in protective coil coatings for the HVAC industry. GCCC’s new facility, located in Tyler, Texas is being equipped with the latest equipment and will incorporate the proprietary, “H-TRACC” automated coating line. At GCCC, the new standard for performance will be a coil coating process that measures deliveries in days rather than weeks. This new delivery standard can give your company a distinct competitive edge in your industry. Now there is simply no reason to leave valuable equipment unprotected or to utilize an inferior coating. Operations are expected to begin in December.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dalkopak

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Dalkopak specializes in manufacturing of weldments, tube bending and machining. The company was founded in 2012 from a joint venture between Dalkotech and Eco-Pak. They mutually share 50 years of combined industry experience in welded elements manufacturing, sub-assembly preparation and packaging. Our manufacturing is done out of Juarez Mexico, the head office is located in Valcourt, Qc, Canada. Using the latest technology acquired over the last 3 years, the company’s production capability is currently 95-100K parts per months in a Just-in-Time, high quality production environment. Our integrated solution allows us to provide our customers a wide array of complex bent shapes of tubes and bars, machined parts, weldments which can include castings, forgings, plates, stamping, machining and sub-assemblies. Our robotized and manual MIG welding stations allow us to achieve high quality welds with deep weld penetration and integrity. Using 100% on the line inspection with Check Fixtures (Go / No-Go gauges) and our quality lab, we insure weldments can meet any industry standard. Our quality standard can be adjusted to your requirements and we work with our customers to minimize cost in targeting inspection points that are most relevant. Our location allows us to provide high quality products at a low cost of production with the flexibility of having a North America supplier.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulf-coast-coil-coatings.jpeg
Gulf Coast Coil Coatings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dalkopak.jpeg
Dalkopak
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gulf Coast Coil Coatings
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dalkopak
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gulf Coast Coil Coatings in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dalkopak in 2025.

Incident History — Gulf Coast Coil Coatings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gulf Coast Coil Coatings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dalkopak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dalkopak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulf-coast-coil-coatings.jpeg
Gulf Coast Coil Coatings
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dalkopak.jpeg
Dalkopak
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dalkopak company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dalkopak company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company.

In the current year, Dalkopak company and Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dalkopak company nor Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dalkopak company nor Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dalkopak company nor Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company nor Dalkopak company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings nor Dalkopak holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company nor Dalkopak company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dalkopak company employs more people globally than Gulf Coast Coil Coatings company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings nor Dalkopak holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings nor Dalkopak holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings nor Dalkopak holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings nor Dalkopak holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings nor Dalkopak holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Coil Coatings nor Dalkopak holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H