Comparison Overview

Guilford Press

VS

Cross Country

Guilford Press

370 Seventh Avenue, New York, 10001-1020, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

A proudly independent press, Guilford produces science-based books, journals, and digital content that support individual and societal well-being. We partner with world-renowned clinicians, educators, and researchers to distill their expertise into needed resources for readers around the world. Over decades, we have championed life-changing mental health treatments like CBT, DBT, ACT, and EMDR, as well as transformative perspectives in literacy, research methods, and psychological science, and pioneering journals like AIDS Education and Prevention. Guilford is full of people passionate about the titles we publish--many of whom have been working at the company for decades. Our publishing program is grounded in our strong ethical compass and our commitment to excellence. Based in New York City, we are an equal opportunity employer committed to diversity and inclusion in the workplace.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cross Country

Tollgate, Beddingham, Near Lewes, BN8 6JZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

More journal than magazine, Cross Country aims to keep flyers fuelled with inspiration and information. Founded in 1988, and read in over 75 countries, Cross Country is respected as independent and authoritative. Ten issues are published each year alongside an annual Travel Guide. Cross Country also publishes best-selling technique books. With an engaged community and a well respected voice in Paragliding, Paramotoring and HangGliding, Cross Country offers many partnership opportunities for the discerning brands wanting to inspire and make people dream of freedom and adventure.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guilford-publications.jpeg
Guilford Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cross-country.jpeg
Cross Country
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Guilford Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cross Country
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guilford Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cross Country in 2025.

Incident History — Guilford Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guilford Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cross Country (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cross Country cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guilford-publications.jpeg
Guilford Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cross-country.jpeg
Cross Country
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cross Country company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Guilford Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cross Country company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Guilford Press company.

In the current year, Cross Country company and Guilford Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cross Country company nor Guilford Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cross Country company nor Guilford Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cross Country company nor Guilford Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Guilford Press company nor Cross Country company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Guilford Press nor Cross Country holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Guilford Press company nor Cross Country company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cross Country company employs more people globally than Guilford Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Guilford Press nor Cross Country holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Guilford Press nor Cross Country holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Guilford Press nor Cross Country holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Guilford Press nor Cross Country holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Guilford Press nor Cross Country holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Guilford Press nor Cross Country holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.