Comparison Overview

Guggenheim New York

VS

Australian Museums and Galleries Association

Guggenheim New York

1071 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10128, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1937, the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation is dedicated to promoting the understanding and appreciation of art, architecture, and other manifestations of visual culture, primarily of the modern and contemporary periods. The Guggenheim realizes this mission through exceptional exhibitions, education programs, research initiatives, and publications. The Guggenheim strives to engage and educate an increasingly diverse international audience through its unique network of museums and partnerships. With nearly three million annual visitors worldwide, the Guggenheim and its network is one of the most visited cultural institutions in the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Australian Museums and Galleries Association

Canberra, 2600, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Australian Museums and Galleries Association Incorporated (AMaGA) is the national association and peak advocacy body representing museums and galleries. We encompass a wide and diverse range of national, state, regional and community museums, galleries, historic sites, botanic and zoological gardens, research centres, Indigenous cultural centres, and Keeping Places across Australia. All of our members are, however, linked by a shared dedication to culture, the arts, movable cultural heritage and communities, and the knowledge that Australian cultural life is a dynamic ecosystem that generates creativity and innovation and contributes to the social and economic wellbeing of the country.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-australia.jpeg
Australian Museums and Galleries Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Guggenheim New York
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australian Museums and Galleries Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guggenheim New York in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Museums and Galleries Association in 2025.

Incident History — Guggenheim New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guggenheim New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australian Museums and Galleries Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Museums and Galleries Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-australia.jpeg
Australian Museums and Galleries Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Guggenheim New York company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Museums and Galleries Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australian Museums and Galleries Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Guggenheim New York company.

In the current year, Australian Museums and Galleries Association company and Guggenheim New York company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australian Museums and Galleries Association company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australian Museums and Galleries Association company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australian Museums and Galleries Association company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Guggenheim New York company employs more people globally than Australian Museums and Galleries Association company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X