Comparison Overview

Guggenheim New York

VS

Aberdeen Science Centre

Guggenheim New York

1071 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10128, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.guggenheim.org

Founded in 1937, the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation is dedicated to promoting the understanding and appreciation of art, architecture, and other manifestations of visual culture, primarily of the modern and contemporary periods. The Guggenheim realizes this mission through exceptional exhibitions, education programs, research initiatives, and publications. The Guggenheim strives to engage and educate an increasingly diverse international audience through its unique network of museums and partnerships. With nearly three million annual visitors worldwide, the Guggenheim and its network is one of the most visited cultural institutions in the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Aberdeen Science Centre

179 Constitution Street, Aberdeen, undefined, AB24 5TU, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aberdeensciencecentre.org

Making Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) fun, exciting, engaging and inspiring for families, schools and communities is our core mission. Established in 1989, Aberdeen Science Centre is a recognised charity that aims to serve as a STEM Hub to connect and engage members of the public, industry, academia and government. As a landmark visitor attraction, we encourage active involvement in learning with hands-on exhibits, investigative workshops and exciting shows and demonstrations. We promote an environment of curiosity and life-long learning. As a STEM partner, we work with local organisations to help them showcase their innovation and fulfill their Corporate Social Responsibility objectives. We also provide original meeting facilities - ranging from meeting rooms to show theaters - along with tailor-made services (catering, visits, workshops, etc.). Work with us and enrich your organisation. Contact us on 01224 640340 or [email protected]

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aberdeen-science-centre.jpeg
Aberdeen Science Centre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Guggenheim New York
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aberdeen Science Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guggenheim New York in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aberdeen Science Centre in 2026.

Incident History — Guggenheim New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guggenheim New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aberdeen Science Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aberdeen Science Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aberdeen-science-centre.jpeg
Aberdeen Science Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Guggenheim New York company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aberdeen Science Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aberdeen Science Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Guggenheim New York company.

In the current year, Aberdeen Science Centre company and Guggenheim New York company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Aberdeen Science Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Aberdeen Science Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Aberdeen Science Centre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Guggenheim New York company employs more people globally than Aberdeen Science Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Aberdeen Science Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Aberdeen Science Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Aberdeen Science Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Aberdeen Science Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Aberdeen Science Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Aberdeen Science Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References