Comparison Overview

GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.)

VS

Regal Court Reporting, Inc.

GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.)

519 Court Place, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At GTNlaw, we strive to provide our clients with the utmost service and attention. Our law firm encompasses all aspects of a general practicing boutique law firm, allowing us to cater to our clients’ specific, special needs. Since 1965, our firm has garnered both experience and a reputation for achieving excellence. We are more than willing to elicit our expertise so that our clients are represented professionally, fairly, and with the greatest discretion. As one of the area’s premier law firms, our firm has represented over twelve thousand individuals as well as ten thousand corporations. We pride ourselves on our personal approach and we will work hard to individualize and customize our services to fit your needs. Our attorneys believe that a personal environment paired with a strong client-attorney relationship is the key to success. However, our firm also possesses the tools to service major corporations and municipal entities. For over forty years, we at GTNlaw, have proven that both our expertise and our client satisfaction are factors that have contributed to our longevity. Our firm is a leading participant in the field of law and we commit ourselves to servicing our clients with excellence, honorability, and merit. To better service our clients, we not only have our downtown Pittsburgh office, but we operate three other satellite locations around Western Pennsylvania. The firm, in affiliation with its municipal bond practice, is also listed in The Bond Buyer’s Municipal Marketplace directory as a qualified practice to offer independent opinions on municipal bond issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Regal Court Reporting, Inc.

1820 E. First Street, Santa Ana, 92705, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Regal Court Reporting is an independently owned agency created by partners who have years of experience in the court reporting and legal services industry. Our team includes court reporters and support staff and our mission is to relieve law firms of as much of the stress and burden of discovery as is possible allowing them to spend more time focusing on their clients. We do this be providing the highest skilled and experienced reporters in the industry along with a support staff trained to the latest standards, codes and practices. We also offer a comprehensive array of state-of-the-art technology.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gtnlaw-pc.jpeg
GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regal-court-reporting-inc..jpeg
Regal Court Reporting, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Regal Court Reporting, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regal Court Reporting, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Regal Court Reporting, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regal Court Reporting, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gtnlaw-pc.jpeg
GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regal-court-reporting-inc..jpeg
Regal Court Reporting, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company and Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company.

In the current year, Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company and GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company nor GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company nor GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company nor GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Regal Court Reporting, Inc. company employs more people globally than GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GTNlaw (Gaitens, Tucceri & Nicholas, P.C.) nor Regal Court Reporting, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X