Comparison Overview

Gtank

VS

Textcetera

Gtank

25 Dalveen Drive, Glasgow, Scotland, G71 6, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Gtank is Garry Stevenson's freelance graphic design business. Based in Uddingston, near Glasgow, he started Gtank because he realised from previous employment that bigger does not always mean better. Because overheads are minimal, he can offer a high standard of graphic design, often at a more competitive price than larger agencies. Gtank offer a full design service. If, for any reason, we can’t fulfil your requirements with our broad skillset, we have professional contacts that we can 100% rely on. Garry is also an Adobe Certified Expert in Photoshop, so can guarantee that any retouching will be of the highest quality. Also, if your agency is looking for freelance cover for your business, due to staff shortages or any other reason, please get in touch. With his wide range of skills and flexibility across many disciplines, Garry can hit the ground running quickly in almost any design environment. What we do Web design Design for print across all mediums Logo design Branding Freelance cover Professional Photoshop retouching Advertising across print and digital App User Interface design Text, graphics and video for social media Facebook advertising Email campaign design Infographics Presentation slide design TV storyboards Apparel design

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Textcetera

Saturnusstraat 60 unit 85, Den Haag, 2516 AH, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Wij zijn een ervaren vormgevingsbureau, gespecialiseerd in de opmaak van boeken en andere publicaties. We proberen hierbij het ambacht van grafische vormgeving te combineren met de efficiëntie van de hedendaagse automatisering. Zo kunnen we voldoen aan vrijwel iedere vraag op het gebied van vormgeving. Van grafisch concept tot digitale publicatie.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gtank.jpeg
Gtank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/textcetera.jpeg
Textcetera
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gtank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Textcetera
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gtank in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Textcetera in 2025.

Incident History — Gtank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gtank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Textcetera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Textcetera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gtank.jpeg
Gtank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/textcetera.jpeg
Textcetera
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Textcetera company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gtank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Textcetera company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gtank company.

In the current year, Textcetera company and Gtank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Textcetera company nor Gtank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Textcetera company nor Gtank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Textcetera company nor Gtank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gtank company nor Textcetera company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gtank nor Textcetera holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gtank company nor Textcetera company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Textcetera company employs more people globally than Gtank company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Gtank nor Textcetera holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gtank nor Textcetera holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gtank nor Textcetera holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gtank nor Textcetera holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gtank nor Textcetera holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gtank nor Textcetera holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X