Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GSKGSK
VS
UCBUCB
GSK

GSK

79 New Oxford Street, London, WC1A 1DG, GB

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.gsk.com
823/1000Good

We are uniting science, technology and talent to get ahead of disease together. Our community guidelines: https://gsk.to/socialmedia

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:91,975
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UCB

UCB

Allée de la Recherche, 60, Brussels, BE

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ucb.com
810/1000Good

At UCB, we believe everyone deserves to live the best life they can - as free as possible from the challenges and uncertainty of disease. Our purpose is to support people living with severe central nervous system and immunological conditions by delivering meaningful sol...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:14,451
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GSK

GSK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UCB

UCB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GSK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UCB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GSK

GSK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UCB

UCB

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GSK company and UCB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GSK and UCB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GSK and UCB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GSK or UCB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GSK or UCB ?
Between GSK and UCB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GSK and UCB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES