Comparison Overview

GSA

VS

Region Midtjylland

GSA

1800 F St. NW, Washington, D.C., US, 20405
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

General Services Administration (GSA) is an independent agency of the United States government established in 1949 to help manage and support the basic functioning of federal agencies. Our organization includes the Public Buildings Service (PBS), Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), and a variety of Service and Staff Offices. Learn more about our organization at gsa.gov. Our Mission GSA's mission is to deliver value and savings in real estate, acquisition, technology, and other mission-support services across government. Our Vision Effective and efficient government for the American people. Our Values Service, Accountability, and Innovation ----------- You can also find us on these social media sites: Twitter: https://twitter.com/usgsa Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GSA/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/usgsa/

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,462
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Region Midtjylland

Skottenborg 26, Viborg, undefined, 8800, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Region Midtjyllands mål er at skabe sundhed, trivsel, vækst og velstand for regionens 1,3 millioner borgere. Vi er cirka 30.000 kolleger, der er fælles om at sikre helhed og sammenhæng for patienter, brugere og borgere i regionen. Det gælder lige fra at tilbyde den bedste behandling her og nu til at udvikle fremtidens sundhedstilbud, være førende inden for forskning og gøre en indsats for at være en attraktiv og bæredygtig vækstregion. Læs meget mere om Region Midtjylland på www.rm.dk. Følg os også på FB og Twitter: www.twitter.com/regionmidtjylland www.facebook.com/regionmidtjylland

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,546
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/region-midtjylland.jpeg
Region Midtjylland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GSA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Region Midtjylland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSA in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Region Midtjylland in 2025.

Incident History — GSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Region Midtjylland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Region Midtjylland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/region-midtjylland.jpeg
Region Midtjylland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Region Midtjylland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Region Midtjylland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GSA company.

In the current year, Region Midtjylland company and GSA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Region Midtjylland company nor GSA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Region Midtjylland company nor GSA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Region Midtjylland company nor GSA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GSA company nor Region Midtjylland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GSA nor Region Midtjylland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Region Midtjylland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GSA company.

Region Midtjylland company employs more people globally than GSA company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither GSA nor Region Midtjylland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GSA nor Region Midtjylland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GSA nor Region Midtjylland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GSA nor Region Midtjylland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GSA nor Region Midtjylland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GSA nor Region Midtjylland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H