Comparison Overview

Gruppo Unipol

VS

Aviva

Gruppo Unipol

Via Stalingrado 45 Bologna, Italy 40128, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Unipol Group is one of the leading insurance groups in Europe and the leader in Italy in Non-Life business (particularly in Motor and Health), with total premium income of 15.1 billion euros, including 8.7 billion in Non-Life business and 6.4 billion in Life business (2023 figures). Unipol adopts an integrated offering strategy and covers the full range of insurance products, operating mainly through its subsidiary UnipolSai Assicurazioni. The Group is also active in direct auto insurance (Linear Assicurazioni), transport and aviation insurance (Siat), health protection (UniSalute), supplementary pensions, and oversees the bancassurance channel (Arca Vita and Arca Assicurazioni). It also manages significant diversified activities in the real estate, hotel (UNA Group), health care (Centro Medico Santagostino) and agricultural (Tenute del Cerro) sectors. Unipol Gruppo S.p.A. is listed on the Italian stock exchange.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aviva

80 Fenchurch Street, London, undefined, EC3M 4AE, , GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

💛 We're a leading Insurance, Wealth & Retirement business. 📣 Follow for #LifeAtAviva. Aviva is nothing without our people. Living up to our purpose to be with you today for a better tomorrow applies to those we work with just as much as it does to our customers. We want Aviva to be a place where people can be themselves, and we want our workforce to reflect the customers and communities we serve. This means offering market-leading benefits and challenging ourselves to do more to build a workplace – and society – that works for all. It takes you. It takes Aviva.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 24,415
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gruppo-unipol.jpeg
Gruppo Unipol
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aviva-plc.jpeg
Aviva
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gruppo Unipol
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aviva
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gruppo Unipol in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aviva in 2025.

Incident History — Gruppo Unipol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gruppo Unipol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aviva (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aviva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gruppo-unipol.jpeg
Gruppo Unipol
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aviva-plc.jpeg
Aviva
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing, Social Engineering
Motivation: Revenge
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Aviva company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gruppo Unipol company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aviva company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gruppo Unipol company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aviva company and Gruppo Unipol company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aviva company nor Gruppo Unipol company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aviva company nor Gruppo Unipol company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Aviva company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gruppo Unipol company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gruppo Unipol company nor Aviva company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Aviva holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aviva company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gruppo Unipol company.

Aviva company employs more people globally than Gruppo Unipol company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Aviva holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Aviva holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Aviva holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Aviva holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Aviva holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Aviva holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N