Comparison Overview

Grupo Zeta

VS

F.A. Davis

Grupo Zeta

Consell de Cent, 425, Barcelona, 08009, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grupozeta.es

Grupo Zeta es uno de los principales holdings de comunicación de España. Cuenta con siete diarios de información general y uno deportivo, más de sesenta publicaciones gratuitas, diecisiete revistas de venta en quiosco, más de treinta y cinco revistas corporativas elaboradas para terceros clientes, una editorial de libros, una agencia exclusivista comercial, cinco rotativas de impresión y un área digital.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 335
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

F.A. Davis

1915 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fadavis.com

Headquartered in Philadelphia, the city of its founding in 1879, F.A. Davis is an independent, family-owned publisher of teaching and learning solutions for nursing and the health sciences. From flagship titles like Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary to online, adaptive platforms like Davis Advantage and Medical Language Lab, the company is dedicated to developing innovative products empowered by the technology that is changing how students are learning, instructors are teaching, and professionals are practicing. The breadth and depth of print, digital, and online resources across disciplines and specialties is a firm foundation on which to meet the challenges of the future.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 577
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-zeta.jpeg
Grupo Zeta
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/f-a--davis-company.jpeg
F.A. Davis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grupo Zeta
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
F.A. Davis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Zeta in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for F.A. Davis in 2025.

Incident History — Grupo Zeta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Zeta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — F.A. Davis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

F.A. Davis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-zeta.jpeg
Grupo Zeta
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/f-a--davis-company.jpeg
F.A. Davis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

F.A. Davis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grupo Zeta company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, F.A. Davis company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grupo Zeta company.

In the current year, F.A. Davis company and Grupo Zeta company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither F.A. Davis company nor Grupo Zeta company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither F.A. Davis company nor Grupo Zeta company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither F.A. Davis company nor Grupo Zeta company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grupo Zeta company nor F.A. Davis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grupo Zeta nor F.A. Davis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Grupo Zeta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to F.A. Davis company.

F.A. Davis company employs more people globally than Grupo Zeta company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Grupo Zeta nor F.A. Davis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grupo Zeta nor F.A. Davis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grupo Zeta nor F.A. Davis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grupo Zeta nor F.A. Davis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grupo Zeta nor F.A. Davis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grupo Zeta nor F.A. Davis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References