Comparison Overview

Grupo SIGA

VS

Polarteknik UK

Grupo SIGA

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Somos un grupo mexicano que nos apasiona estar cerca de nuestros clientes; nuestra seriedad y dinamismo han logrado combinar un servicio único logrando así resultados que generan avance y rentabilidad. En Grupo SIGA, promovemos el desarrollo de las empresas a través de la innovación. Nos involucramos en áreas de automatización e integración de procesos, asesoría y mantenimiento, construcción de obras eléctricas y civiles, además de maquinado de piezas y pailería. Así mismo, contamos con un departamento enfocado al desarrollo de proyectos en el área sustentable.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Polarteknik UK

3 Garamonde Dr, Wymbush, MK8 8DF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Polarteknik UK is Europe's leading rail door system OEM and rolling stock engineering company based out of Milton Keynes, United Kingdom. As an OEM our products are fitted to more than 60% of all UK passenger trains. The UK site serves as the Aftersales, Projects, Repair and Overhaul centre of excellence for Polarteknik. We strive to support all train operators and leasing companies by providing a fast, effective and high quality service for all types of rail door systems regardless of age, type and OEM.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-siga.jpeg
Grupo SIGA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/train-door-solutions-ltd.jpeg
Polarteknik UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grupo SIGA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Polarteknik UK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo SIGA in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Polarteknik UK in 2025.

Incident History — Grupo SIGA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo SIGA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Polarteknik UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Polarteknik UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-siga.jpeg
Grupo SIGA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/train-door-solutions-ltd.jpeg
Polarteknik UK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grupo SIGA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Polarteknik UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Polarteknik UK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grupo SIGA company.

In the current year, Polarteknik UK company and Grupo SIGA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Polarteknik UK company nor Grupo SIGA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Polarteknik UK company nor Grupo SIGA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Polarteknik UK company nor Grupo SIGA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grupo SIGA company nor Polarteknik UK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grupo SIGA nor Polarteknik UK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grupo SIGA company nor Polarteknik UK company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grupo SIGA company employs more people globally than Polarteknik UK company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Grupo SIGA nor Polarteknik UK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grupo SIGA nor Polarteknik UK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grupo SIGA nor Polarteknik UK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grupo SIGA nor Polarteknik UK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grupo SIGA nor Polarteknik UK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grupo SIGA nor Polarteknik UK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H