Comparison Overview

Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman

VS

Notariskantoor Theunissen

Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman

99 Monroe Ave NW, Ste 800, Grand Rapids, Michigan, US, 49503
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Since 1985, Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman PLLC has been a trusted legal advocate for injury victims across West Michigan and beyond. Based in Grand Rapids, our firm combines the personalized attention of a boutique practice with the results-driven approach of a nationally recognized law firm. We specialize in a wide range of personal injury matters, including vehicle and construction accidents, medical malpractice, and sexual abuse cases. Our attorneys are known for their integrity, legal expertise, and commitment to securing full compensation for our clients. Recognized as a Tier 1 “Best Law Firm” in Grand Rapids by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® and holding an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell, we are proud to serve our community with excellence and compassion.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Notariskantoor Theunissen

Stadhuisplein 10, Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, 5611 EM, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-28

De focus van Notariskantoor Theunissen ligt op de MKB-praktijk en alle daarmee samenhangende juridische aspecten voor de ondernemer in privé. Volgens ons is een belangrijk uitgangspunt voor een goed juridisch advies dat we niet alleen op de hoogte zijn van uw product en de markt waarin u zich begeeft, maar ook van uw filosofie als ondernemer. Vanuit die basisgedachte zoeken wij steeds naar die oplossing die zowel voor u als uw onderneming de meeste zekerheid biedt. Een notariële akte is voor ons geen doel, maar kan een sluitstuk zijn van een (soms langdurig) advies- of begeleidingstraject.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gruel-mills-nims-&-pylman.jpeg
Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/notariskantoor-theunissen.jpeg
Notariskantoor Theunissen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Notariskantoor Theunissen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Notariskantoor Theunissen in 2025.

Incident History — Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Notariskantoor Theunissen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notariskantoor Theunissen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gruel-mills-nims-&-pylman.jpeg
Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/notariskantoor-theunissen.jpeg
Notariskantoor Theunissen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Notariskantoor Theunissen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Notariskantoor Theunissen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company.

In the current year, Notariskantoor Theunissen company and Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Notariskantoor Theunissen company nor Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Notariskantoor Theunissen company nor Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Notariskantoor Theunissen company nor Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company nor Notariskantoor Theunissen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman nor Notariskantoor Theunissen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company nor Notariskantoor Theunissen company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman company employs more people globally than Notariskantoor Theunissen company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman nor Notariskantoor Theunissen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman nor Notariskantoor Theunissen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman nor Notariskantoor Theunissen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman nor Notariskantoor Theunissen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman nor Notariskantoor Theunissen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gruel Mills Nims & Pylman nor Notariskantoor Theunissen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X