Comparison Overview

Grub Burger Bar

VS

Jack in the Box

Grub Burger Bar

undefined, Austin, Texas, 77881, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Weโ€™re passionate about great food, great drinks and great hospitality. We believe in fresh ingredients and big flavors, delivered by caring, friendly people. And we know that a lively environment makes it all feel and taste better. We achieve this by following our three values: Be Positive, Own It, and Grow. At Grub we use quality, fresh, and differentiating ingredients. -Our buns are baked from scratch every hour. -All of our sauces and dressings are homemade. #youdoyou Our Purpose is "Helping Motivated People Achieve Their Dreams"โ€‹ We do this by following our 3 core Values: -Be Positive - My Attitude Matters -Own It! - I am Responsible. -Grow - I create my own Circumstances In order to achieve an EXTRADORDINARY Customer Experience, our Purpose and Values are top priority! #hungryformore Of course you are! Check out our website: www.grubburgerbar.com

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 196
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jack in the Box

9357 Spectrum Center Blvd, None, San Diego, California, US, 92123
Last Update: 2025-05-27 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, letโ€™s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert O. Peterson in San Diego, California? Yeah, you probably did. Did you know Jack in the Box pioneered a number of firsts in the quick-serve industry, including menu items that are now staples on most fast-food menu boards, like the breakfast sandwich and portable salads. Sure. Did you know Jack in the Box has over 2000 locations? Everyone knows that. Whatever the reason you came to Jack in the Box's LinkedIn page...welcome, weโ€™re happy to have you here.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 23,896
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grub-burger-bar.jpeg
Grub Burger Bar
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jack-in-the-box.jpeg
Jack in the Box
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Grub Burger Bar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jack in the Box
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grub Burger Bar in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jack in the Box in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Grub Burger Bar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grub Burger Bar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Jack in the Box (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jack in the Box cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grub-burger-bar.jpeg
Grub Burger Bar
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jack-in-the-box.jpeg
Jack in the Box
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Grub Burger Bar company and Jack in the Box company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Jack in the Box company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Grub Burger Bar company has not reported any.

In the current year, Jack in the Box company and Grub Burger Bar company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jack in the Box company nor Grub Burger Bar company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Jack in the Box company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Grub Burger Bar company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Jack in the Box company nor Grub Burger Bar company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grub Burger Bar company nor Jack in the Box company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Jack in the Box company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Grub Burger Bar company.

Jack in the Box company employs more people globally than Grub Burger Bar company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X