Comparison Overview

growURpotential

VS

Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp

growURpotential

6535 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, 90048, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

We are a nonprofit mental health agency, healing justice clinical training site, and capacity-building hub for Queer, Trans, and People of Color. Our community of allies is committed to expanding access to supportive services that facilitate growth and well-being for marginalized hearts by marginalized hearts. We offer sliding-scale fee counseling services to individuals, couples, and families and we eagerly support LGBT Youth. Everyone encounters confusion and uncertainty at some point in life and it's natural to want support during these times. Difficulties parenting, teenage struggles, oppression, career challenges, identity issues, retirement transition, creative blocks, sustaining relationships, navigating grief or divorce, and an inability to accomplish goals are all issues we expect ourselves to resolve on our own, and we often feel defeated when we can't. Therapy is support that helps unearth our own best decisions.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp

8019 COMPTON AVE, LOS ANGELES, California, US, 90001
Last Update: 2026-01-12
Between 700 and 749

Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp. is a not for profit community based mental health center serving children and families from birth through the end of the golden years. Our goal at TCCSC is to give children and families opportunities for growth, development, self-sufficiency and reliance through innovative programming. Our service delivery model of providing services wherever necessary and convenient to the child and family is recognized countywide and is the cornerstone of our organization. We use it as our strategy to bring our services to everyone in the community. TCCSC is a visionary agency, constantly looking for the next pioneering program to enhance our “out-of-the-box” methods of delivering services.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/growurpotential.jpeg
growURpotential
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tessie-cleveland-community-services-corporation.jpeg
Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
growURpotential
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for growURpotential in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp in 2026.

Incident History — growURpotential (X = Date, Y = Severity)

growURpotential cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/growurpotential.jpeg
growURpotential
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tessie-cleveland-community-services-corporation.jpeg
Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

growURpotential company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas growURpotential company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company and growURpotential company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company nor growURpotential company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company has disclosed at least one data breach, while growURpotential company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company nor growURpotential company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither growURpotential company nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither growURpotential nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither growURpotential company nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp company employs more people globally than growURpotential company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither growURpotential nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither growURpotential nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither growURpotential nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither growURpotential nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither growURpotential nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp holds HIPAA certification.

Neither growURpotential nor Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corp holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N