Comparison Overview

Jean Coutu

VS

Starbucks

Jean Coutu

245 Rue Jean-Coutu Varennes, Quebec J3X 0E1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jeancoutu.com

Fondé en 1969, le réseau Jean Coutu figure parmi les noms les plus réputés dans l’industrie canadienne de la vente au détail en pharmacie et compte un réseau de plus de 420 établissements franchisés au Québec, au Nouveau-Brunswick et en Ontario sous les bannières PJC Jean Coutu, PJC Santé et PJC Santé Beauté. Pour en savoir davantage, visitez jeancoutu.com.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Starbucks

2401 Utah Ave S, None, Seattle, WA, US, 98134
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.starbucks.com/careers

At Starbucks, we like to say that we are not in the coffee business serving people, but in the people business serving coffee. Here, our employees - who we call partners – are the heart of the Starbucks experience, and being a partner means aspiring to become part of something bigger: inspiring positive change in the world and growing in your career and in your community. ​ It’s an opportunity to be your personal best. ​ Starbucks is an equal opportunity employer of all qualified individuals, including minorities, veterans and individuals with disabilities.​​ In everything we do, we are dedicated to our mission: To be the premier purveyor of the finest coffee in the world, inspiring and nurturing the human spirit — one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time. Join us. Inspire with every cup. Explore opportunities, benefits and more at careers.starbucks.com

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 172,345
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/groupe-jean-coutu.jpeg
Jean Coutu
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starbucks.jpeg
Starbucks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jean Coutu
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Starbucks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jean Coutu in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Starbucks in 2025.

Incident History — Jean Coutu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jean Coutu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Starbucks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Starbucks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/groupe-jean-coutu.jpeg
Jean Coutu
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starbucks.jpeg
Starbucks
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Starbucks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jean Coutu company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Starbucks company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Jean Coutu company has not reported any.

In the current year, Starbucks company and Jean Coutu company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Starbucks company nor Jean Coutu company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Starbucks company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Jean Coutu company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Starbucks company nor Jean Coutu company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jean Coutu company nor Starbucks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Starbucks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Starbucks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jean Coutu company.

Starbucks company employs more people globally than Jean Coutu company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Starbucks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Starbucks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Starbucks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Starbucks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Starbucks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Starbucks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References