Comparison Overview

Jean Coutu

VS

Intermarché

Jean Coutu

245 Rue Jean-Coutu Varennes, Quebec J3X 0E1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Fondé en 1969, le réseau Jean Coutu figure parmi les noms les plus réputés dans l’industrie canadienne de la vente au détail en pharmacie et compte un réseau de plus de 420 établissements franchisés au Québec, au Nouveau-Brunswick et en Ontario sous les bannières PJC Jean Coutu, PJC Santé et PJC Santé Beauté. Pour en savoir davantage, visitez jeancoutu.com.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Intermarché

21 allée des Mousquetaires, Parc de Tréville, Bondoufle, FR, 91078
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Reconnue pour son combat contre la vie chère, Intermarché s'appuie sur un réseau de 2 328 points de vente en Europe (France, Belgique, Pologne, Portugal). Spécialiste des produits frais, l’enseigne propose différents formats de points de vente pour répondre aux attentes de ses clients : - Intermarché Hyper : un format offrant une gamme complète en alimentaire et en non-alimentaire. - Intermarché Super : deux déclinaisons existent selon la localisation. . Le supermarché généraliste qui propose une offre équilibrée entre alimentaire et non-alimentaire. . Le supermarché alimentaire dont 90 % des produits sont consacrés à l’alimentaire. - Intermarché Contact : un format qui associe l'esprit convivial et le confort d'un commerce de proximité essentiellement en zone rurale. - Intermarché Express : un concept spécialement étudié pour les centres-ville des grandes agglomérations.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 21,425
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/groupe-jean-coutu.jpeg
Jean Coutu
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intermarche.jpeg
Intermarché
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jean Coutu
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Intermarché
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jean Coutu in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intermarché in 2025.

Incident History — Jean Coutu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jean Coutu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Intermarché (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intermarché cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/groupe-jean-coutu.jpeg
Jean Coutu
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intermarche.jpeg
Intermarché
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Intermarché company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jean Coutu company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Intermarché company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jean Coutu company.

In the current year, Intermarché company and Jean Coutu company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Intermarché company nor Jean Coutu company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Intermarché company nor Jean Coutu company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Intermarché company nor Jean Coutu company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jean Coutu company nor Intermarché company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Intermarché holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intermarché company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jean Coutu company.

Intermarché company employs more people globally than Jean Coutu company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Intermarché holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Intermarché holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Intermarché holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Intermarché holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Intermarché holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jean Coutu nor Intermarché holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N