Comparison Overview

Group Origin

VS

little blue deer

Group Origin

Mazaya Business Avenue, BB01, JLT, 500599, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Origin is an award-winning corporate design and communications firm. Established 24 years ago in London and present in the UAE since 2004, we have clients in all six GCC countries. We are specialists in branding, marketing and reporting, and we work with many of the region’s best known corporates and public sector institutions. Among them are Almarai, ADCB, ADNOC Group, ENOC, Bank of Bahrain & Kuwait, Damas, Dolphin Energy, Dubai Parks & Resorts, Etihad Airways, Etisalat, Gulf Investment Corporation, Mubadala, Ooredoo, and SEHA (Abu Dhabi Health Services Company). Instagram: http://bit.ly/grouporiginig Facebook: http://bit.ly/grouporiginfb LinkedIn: http://bit.ly/grouporiginln

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

little blue deer

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Little Blue Deer offers elegant, customized blog and boutique website design, as well as logo and print advertising. Shari Miller, the owner and inspiration behind Little Blue Deer, has over 10 years of experience in public relations, marketing and graphic design, and is a graduate of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/group-origin.jpeg
Group Origin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/little-blue-deer.jpeg
little blue deer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Group Origin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
little blue deer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Group Origin in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for little blue deer in 2025.

Incident History — Group Origin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Group Origin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — little blue deer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

little blue deer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/group-origin.jpeg
Group Origin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/little-blue-deer.jpeg
little blue deer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

little blue deer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Group Origin company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, little blue deer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Group Origin company.

In the current year, little blue deer company and Group Origin company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither little blue deer company nor Group Origin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither little blue deer company nor Group Origin company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither little blue deer company nor Group Origin company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Group Origin company nor little blue deer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Group Origin nor little blue deer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Group Origin company nor little blue deer company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Group Origin company employs more people globally than little blue deer company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Group Origin nor little blue deer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Group Origin nor little blue deer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Group Origin nor little blue deer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Group Origin nor little blue deer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Group Origin nor little blue deer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Group Origin nor little blue deer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X