Comparison Overview

Group Homes Australia

VS

S&R Group

Group Homes Australia

undefined, Sydney, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 750 and 799

Group Homes Australia (GHA) was founded in 2012 by Tamar Krebs who had a vision to Do Dementia Differently. Our philosophy revolves around creating small, intimate environments integrated within local communities. Catering for 6-10 residents, our homes exude a warm, friendly atmosphere. Residents receive personal, tailored care and we work tirelessly to ensure that each can cherish life's moments and live well with dementia. Our homes look, smell and feel like a traditional home. Additionally, we provide a warm, engaging environment, where the highest quality of care is provided, and where people feel genuinely at home, supported by professionals who are passionate about what they do. With a high carer-to-resident ratio (averaging 1:3), being under-pinned by best practice clinical care, our specialised approach focuses on getting residents involved in day-to-day life activities that bring them purpose and meaning, including: - Cooking and baking - Exercise and yoga - Helping to hang the laundry - Gardening activities - Shopping outings if desired - Walks around the neighbourhood - Public outings to cafes, art galleries, visit other houses GHA currently has 21 homes in Sydney, on the North Shore, Hills District, Hunters Hill, Inner West, Eastern Suburbs, Northern Beaches and Sutherland Shire.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

S&R Group

200-265 North Front Street, Sarnia, Ontario, N7t 7X1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 750 and 799

Creating communities that are good for life: The S&R Group creates communities that are good for life, developing, owning, and managing retirement communities, long term care homes, and commercial and multi-residential properties. Our success is based on the creation of communities where residents, tenants and employees flourish. The measure of our success is the passion our residents feel for the community and our team members for their work.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 182
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/group-homes-australia.jpeg
Group Homes Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steeves-&-rozema-group.jpeg
S&R Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Group Homes Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
S&R Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Group Homes Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S&R Group in 2025.

Incident History — Group Homes Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Group Homes Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — S&R Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S&R Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/group-homes-australia.jpeg
Group Homes Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steeves-&-rozema-group.jpeg
S&R Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

S&R Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Group Homes Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, S&R Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Group Homes Australia company.

In the current year, S&R Group company and Group Homes Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither S&R Group company nor Group Homes Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither S&R Group company nor Group Homes Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither S&R Group company nor Group Homes Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Group Homes Australia company nor S&R Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Group Homes Australia nor S&R Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Group Homes Australia company nor S&R Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

S&R Group company employs more people globally than Group Homes Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Group Homes Australia nor S&R Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Group Homes Australia nor S&R Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Group Homes Australia nor S&R Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Group Homes Australia nor S&R Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Group Homes Australia nor S&R Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Group Homes Australia nor S&R Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N