Comparison Overview

Grounds For Sculpture

VS

MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)

Grounds For Sculpture

80 Sculptors Way, Hamilton, New Jersey, 08619, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Grounds For Sculpture is a 42-acre sculpture park and museum located in Hamilton, NJ on the former site of the New Jersey State Fairgrounds. Founded in 1992 by John Seward Johnson II, the venue was intended to be dedicated to promoting an understanding of and appreciation for contemporary sculpture by organizing exhibitions and offering a variety of educational programs and special community events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)

1000 Englewood Parkway #2-230, Englewood, CO, 80110, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of Outdoor Arts (MOA) is a forerunner in the placement of site-specific sculpture in Colorado. MOA specializes in creating environments that promote a range of sculpture, as well as performance art. Our art collection is located within various public locations throughout the Denver metro area. From commercial office parks to botanic gardens, city parks and traditional sculpture gardens; art is placed to interpret space as "a museum without walls." Employing a combination of art, architecture, and landscape, MOA is best known for integrating these disciplines in order to create exemplary environments. Foremost, the Museum of Outdoor Arts believes in 'making art a part of everyday life' by integrating the arts into public spaces accessible by all. MOA is headquartered at Marjorie Park / Fiddler's Green Amphitheatre where it hosts a range of seasonal art events, programs and art installations. The park is also available to rent for private events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grounds-for-sculpture.jpeg
Grounds For Sculpture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-outdoor-arts.jpeg
MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grounds For Sculpture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grounds For Sculpture in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) in 2026.

Incident History — Grounds For Sculpture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grounds For Sculpture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grounds-for-sculpture.jpeg
Grounds For Sculpture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-outdoor-arts.jpeg
MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grounds For Sculpture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grounds For Sculpture company.

In the current year, MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company and Grounds For Sculpture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company nor Grounds For Sculpture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company nor Grounds For Sculpture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company nor Grounds For Sculpture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture company nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture company nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grounds For Sculpture company employs more people globally than MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H