Comparison Overview

Grounds For Sculpture

VS

DuPage Children's Museum

Grounds For Sculpture

80 Sculptors Way, Hamilton, New Jersey, 08619, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.groundsforsculpture.org

Grounds For Sculpture is a 42-acre sculpture park and museum located in Hamilton, NJ on the former site of the New Jersey State Fairgrounds. Founded in 1992 by John Seward Johnson II, the venue was intended to be dedicated to promoting an understanding of and appreciation for contemporary sculpture by organizing exhibitions and offering a variety of educational programs and special community events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DuPage Children's Museum

301 N. Washington St., Naperville, IL, 60540, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dupagechildrens.org

DuPage Children’s Museum is a top Chicago-area cultural attraction…where learning comes in to play®! Via interactive exhibits and programs that make learning fun for children and adults playing together, DuPage Children's Museum helps develop curiosity, creativity, thinking and problem solving in young children. The Museum is located at 301 N. Washington Street in Naperville, Illinois, a quick walk from the Naperville Metra train station. Parking is free and the building is wheelchair accessible. For information about hours, Museum admission and membership packages, visit www.dupagechildrensmuseum.org or call (630) 637-8000.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grounds-for-sculpture.jpeg
Grounds For Sculpture
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dupage-children's-museum.jpeg
DuPage Children's Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grounds For Sculpture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DuPage Children's Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grounds For Sculpture in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DuPage Children's Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Grounds For Sculpture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grounds For Sculpture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DuPage Children's Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DuPage Children's Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grounds-for-sculpture.jpeg
Grounds For Sculpture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dupage-children's-museum.jpeg
DuPage Children's Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Grounds For Sculpture company and DuPage Children's Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, DuPage Children's Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grounds For Sculpture company.

In the current year, DuPage Children's Museum company and Grounds For Sculpture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DuPage Children's Museum company nor Grounds For Sculpture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DuPage Children's Museum company nor Grounds For Sculpture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DuPage Children's Museum company nor Grounds For Sculpture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture company nor DuPage Children's Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor DuPage Children's Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture company nor DuPage Children's Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grounds For Sculpture company employs more people globally than DuPage Children's Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor DuPage Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor DuPage Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor DuPage Children's Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor DuPage Children's Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor DuPage Children's Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grounds For Sculpture nor DuPage Children's Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References