Comparison Overview

Grit

VS

Label Works

Grit

80 Choate Circle, Montoursville, Pennsylvania, 17754, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

HISTORY: Grit began in 1882, as the Saturday supplement to the Williamsport Daily Sun and Banner newspaper. As its circulation quickly grew from just a small local paper to a national paper, it became “America’s Greatest Family Newspaper”. In 1905, Grit nearly employed two hundred people. Commercial printing was added to the Grit’s Publishing company’s successful newspaper in the early 1900’s. After over one hundred years of publishing success and growth, the newspaper fell on hard times. In the fall of 1992, Grit Publishing Company was dissolved. At the time, the commercial print division was purchased by its current owners. Today, Grit Printing and Direct Mail, operates in its modern facility in Montoursville, PA. TODAY: WHAT WE DO At Grit, we offer a wide range of products and services. Our print production capabilities include: sheet fed up to 40”, both stagnant and variable data digital production, and wide format solutions. Complimenting our print, we offer a full array of bindery and finishing options. These include: folding, booklet making, die cutting, inserting, shrink wrapping, and kit fulfillment. Our experience and knowledge in direct mail is unmatched in the commercial print market place. Our customers enjoy an experienced, friendly, and knowledgeable customer service team that guides your project from our modern prepress department to your front door. CORE VALUES: At Grit, our culture follows these guiding principles: 1. Customer 1st 2. Grow, Respect, Inspire, Teach 3. Be the Best Team Always 4. We Care 5. Solution Provider 6. InteGRITy

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Label Works

2025 Lookout Drive, North Mankato, MN, 56003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Working with Label Works is just plain different than working with other label providers. When you choose to work with us you’ll get the best customer service experience in the industry….we’re Minnesota nice, meets label know-how. Plus you’ll get free targeted sales tools to help make selling labels easy….yep free! The majority of our products ship in just 24 hours…(and the rest of our stuff is pretty darn fast too). Label Works only uses state of the art printing equipment and has the most skilled operators in the industry which means top-notch label quality. As the exclusive provider of freeform (a laser cutting process), you no longer have to worry about size and shape restrictions. Hello label options! Give us a try and experience the Label Works difference! At Label Works, we’re the label experts so you don’t have to be! *Label Works has been in business since 1989 and is located in Mankato, Minnesota. Label Works is the label division for Taylor Corporation, a premier provider of powerful and intuitive products, services and expertise – this includes the interactive, printing and marketing solutions to more than half of the Fortune 500 companies and millions of small businesses and consumers around the world.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grit-printing-&-direct-mail.jpeg
Grit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-works.jpeg
Label Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grit
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Label Works
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grit in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Label Works in 2025.

Incident History — Grit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Label Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Label Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grit-printing-&-direct-mail.jpeg
Grit
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-works.jpeg
Label Works
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Label Works company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grit company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Label Works company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Grit company has not reported any.

In the current year, Label Works company and Grit company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Label Works company nor Grit company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Label Works company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Grit company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Label Works company nor Grit company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grit company nor Label Works company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grit nor Label Works holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Label Works company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Grit company.

Label Works company employs more people globally than Grit company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Grit nor Label Works holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grit nor Label Works holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grit nor Label Works holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grit nor Label Works holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grit nor Label Works holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grit nor Label Works holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L