Comparison Overview

Griffins Lawyers

VS

Illustrated Verdict

Griffins Lawyers

49 Flinders St, Adelaide, South Australia, AU, 5000
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Griffins Lawyers is a dynamic, rapidly growing law firm with offices in Adelaide, Sydney, Melbourne, Gold Coast and Perth. We specialise in commercial, insurance and planning, environmental and local government law. We have over twenty years experience in providing technically proficient and astute legal advice to both national and international clients in all jurisdictions of Australia. We recognise the importance of providing customer service and consistently deliver service of a high standard, ensuring our clients receive the best possible representation. Ultimately we provide business solutions for our clients through the provision of practical and strategic legal services. Our vision is to be recognised as an inspiring company leading the way in the legal profession.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Illustrated Verdict

2 Park Plaza, Suite 216, Boston, 02116, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Illustrated Verdict, Inc. (IV) provides a full suite of litigation support services for medical providers and the legal teams that defend them. IV incorporates cutting-edge technology, certified medical illustrators, courtroom experience, multimedia presentations, and strategic consulting to create cohesive demonstrative evidence presentations. These presentations educate the jury on complex medical and technical issues while keeping them fully engaged in the case. IV, now in our 30th year, builds our support strategies around our clients. As part of our service, we create standard and case-specific “boards” that display relevant medical illustrations with easily understandable annotations, two and three dimensional animations, printable models, and full presentations. We use best-in-class, courtroom specific software, such as Sanction and Trial Director, as well as PowerPoint. IV enables expert witnesses, legal teams, insurance companies, and other interested parties to create their legal strategy together, either face-to-face or through web meetings that use the most secure and effective meeting services.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/griffins-lawyers.jpeg
Griffins Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/illustrated-verdict.jpeg
Illustrated Verdict
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Griffins Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Illustrated Verdict
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Griffins Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Illustrated Verdict in 2025.

Incident History — Griffins Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Griffins Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Illustrated Verdict (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Illustrated Verdict cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/griffins-lawyers.jpeg
Griffins Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/illustrated-verdict.jpeg
Illustrated Verdict
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Illustrated Verdict company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Griffins Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Illustrated Verdict company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Griffins Lawyers company.

In the current year, Illustrated Verdict company and Griffins Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Illustrated Verdict company nor Griffins Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Illustrated Verdict company nor Griffins Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Illustrated Verdict company nor Griffins Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Griffins Lawyers company nor Illustrated Verdict company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Griffins Lawyers nor Illustrated Verdict holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Illustrated Verdict company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Griffins Lawyers company.

Griffins Lawyers company employs more people globally than Illustrated Verdict company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Griffins Lawyers nor Illustrated Verdict holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Griffins Lawyers nor Illustrated Verdict holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Griffins Lawyers nor Illustrated Verdict holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Griffins Lawyers nor Illustrated Verdict holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Griffins Lawyers nor Illustrated Verdict holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Griffins Lawyers nor Illustrated Verdict holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X