Comparison Overview

Grief Encounter

VS

Glen Oaks Hospital

Grief Encounter

The Annex, Daws Lane, Mill Hill , London, UK, NW7, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Grief Encounter is the UK’s leading child bereavement charities providing free and professional support services to bereaved children, young people and their families following the death of someone close. An astonishing 1 in 29 children in the UK under 16 years old will suffer the death of a parent. Bereavement is devastating at any age, but for a child it is beyond tragic and truly unimaginable. The emotions experienced by a child are deeply confusing and the affects can be life altering and long lasting. With no government funding, we rely on donations to enable us to shorten our waiting list and help these children at a time when they are desperate for somewhere to turn. You can find us at www.griefencounter.org.uk @griefencounter For support please call GriefTalk on 0808 802 0111 or email [email protected] For professional training enquiries email [email protected]

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Glen Oaks Hospital

301 e Division St, Greenville, 75402, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

For over 30 years, Glen Oaks Hospital has provided mental health and substance use treatment to adults and older adults. Our mental health hospital is dedicated to service excellence and we make it our mission to offer the highest quality of care in an environment that nurtures healing and growth. Glen Oaks Hospital believes in building healthy communities, which start with healthy individuals, linked through sound relationships to their families, friends, neighbors and peers. Glen Oaks Hospital believes in a holistic approach to treating each individual. We have teamed up with local professionals to provide additional evening programming, fitness classes and therapies to meet both the physical and emotional needs of our patients. We focus on each patient’s emotional and psychological needs to help facilitate recovery. We believe that your physical well-being is essential to your emotional recovery and we want to provide a way for you to be able to focus on both while receiving treatment at our facility.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grief-encounter-project.jpeg
Grief Encounter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glen-oaks-hospital.jpeg
Glen Oaks Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grief Encounter
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glen Oaks Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grief Encounter in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glen Oaks Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — Grief Encounter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grief Encounter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Glen Oaks Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glen Oaks Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grief-encounter-project.jpeg
Grief Encounter
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glen-oaks-hospital.jpeg
Glen Oaks Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Glen Oaks Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grief Encounter company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Glen Oaks Hospital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grief Encounter company.

In the current year, Glen Oaks Hospital company and Grief Encounter company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glen Oaks Hospital company nor Grief Encounter company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glen Oaks Hospital company nor Grief Encounter company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glen Oaks Hospital company nor Grief Encounter company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grief Encounter company nor Glen Oaks Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grief Encounter nor Glen Oaks Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grief Encounter company nor Glen Oaks Hospital company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Glen Oaks Hospital company employs more people globally than Grief Encounter company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Grief Encounter nor Glen Oaks Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor Glen Oaks Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor Glen Oaks Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor Glen Oaks Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor Glen Oaks Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor Glen Oaks Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N