Comparison Overview

Grief Encounter

VS

The Center for Growth and Independence

Grief Encounter

The Annex, Daws Lane, Mill Hill , London, UK, NW7, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Grief Encounter is the UK’s leading child bereavement charities providing free and professional support services to bereaved children, young people and their families following the death of someone close. An astonishing 1 in 29 children in the UK under 16 years old will suffer the death of a parent. Bereavement is devastating at any age, but for a child it is beyond tragic and truly unimaginable. The emotions experienced by a child are deeply confusing and the affects can be life altering and long lasting. With no government funding, we rely on donations to enable us to shorten our waiting list and help these children at a time when they are desperate for somewhere to turn. You can find us at www.griefencounter.org.uk @griefencounter For support please call GriefTalk on 0808 802 0111 or email [email protected] For professional training enquiries email [email protected]

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Center for Growth and Independence

1440 E. Empire Avenue, Benton Harbor, Michigan, 49022, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

501(c)(3) nonprofit organization in Southwest MI, promoting inclusion and independence by serving thousands of individuals with developmental disabilities, physical barriers, mental illness, severe emotional disturbance, and prior criminal backgrounds. We provide Supported Employment, Community Living, Semi-Independent Living, and Respite Care services to people throughout Berrien, Cass, Van Buren, and Kalamazoo counties.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grief-encounter-project.jpeg
Grief Encounter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gateway-services.jpeg
The Center for Growth and Independence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grief Encounter
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Center for Growth and Independence
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grief Encounter in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Center for Growth and Independence in 2026.

Incident History — Grief Encounter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grief Encounter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Center for Growth and Independence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Center for Growth and Independence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grief-encounter-project.jpeg
Grief Encounter
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gateway-services.jpeg
The Center for Growth and Independence
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Center for Growth and Independence company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grief Encounter company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Center for Growth and Independence company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grief Encounter company.

In the current year, The Center for Growth and Independence company and Grief Encounter company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Center for Growth and Independence company nor Grief Encounter company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Center for Growth and Independence company nor Grief Encounter company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Center for Growth and Independence company nor Grief Encounter company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grief Encounter company nor The Center for Growth and Independence company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grief Encounter nor The Center for Growth and Independence holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grief Encounter company nor The Center for Growth and Independence company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grief Encounter company employs more people globally than The Center for Growth and Independence company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Grief Encounter nor The Center for Growth and Independence holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor The Center for Growth and Independence holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor The Center for Growth and Independence holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor The Center for Growth and Independence holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor The Center for Growth and Independence holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grief Encounter nor The Center for Growth and Independence holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N