Comparison Overview

Greyhound Print

VS

Red Line Graphics, Inc.

Greyhound Print

79 whiteladies road Clifton Bristol, Somerset BS8 2NT, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Printing business. All types of printing and copying lithographic and digital.In the heart of clifton on whiteladies road. Established over 20 years and highly recommended for speed , quality and service.Open 9 until 5pm monday to friday and probably the only print shop open on a saturday 10.30am until 2pm.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Red Line Graphics, Inc.

6430 S. Belmont Ave., Indianapolis, IN, 46217, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Red Line Graphics manufactured print, signage, promotional products & apparel for over 20 years. The company was sold in 2012 due to the terminal illness of Founder & CEO, Michael Wadsworth. In that 20+ years of operation, Red Line grew from a single AB Dick in a garage to a 25,000+ square foot structure with 40+ employees.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Greyhound Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-line-graphics-inc..jpeg
Red Line Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greyhound Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Line Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greyhound Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Line Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Greyhound Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greyhound Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red Line Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Line Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Greyhound Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-line-graphics-inc..jpeg
Red Line Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Greyhound Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Red Line Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Red Line Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greyhound Print company.

In the current year, Red Line Graphics, Inc. company and Greyhound Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Red Line Graphics, Inc. company nor Greyhound Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Red Line Graphics, Inc. company nor Greyhound Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Red Line Graphics, Inc. company nor Greyhound Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greyhound Print company nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greyhound Print nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Greyhound Print company nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Greyhound Print nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greyhound Print nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greyhound Print nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greyhound Print nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greyhound Print nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greyhound Print nor Red Line Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N