Comparison Overview

Grey Dog Media

VS

Cognella

Grey Dog Media

590 Market St, West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gogreydog.com

Grey Dog Media LLC creates world‐class custom media to help marketers transform their services or businesses into powerhouse brands. Our highly skilled teams handle every phase of execution, from concept to distribution, with concierge‐level service. Grey Dog jobs are completed on time, on budget and on point, so you can maximize your ROI. Grey Dog Media LLC launched in the spring of 2005 under direction of top publishing and business professionals. The company's first major client was signed within weeks of launching and the company tripled in size by year's end. At Grey Dog Media, we have a passion for excellence. A commitment to client satisfaction continues to fuel the company's healthy growth.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cognella

3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd, San Diego, CA, 92124, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cognella.com

Cognella® is redefining academic publishing by creating teacher-driven, student-centric higher education course materials in print and digital formats under three imprints: Cognella® Academic Publishing, Cognella® Custom, and Cognella® Active Learning. At Cognella, we believe quality academic publishing is about providing students with highly relevant, affordable learning materials. For over 25 years, Cognella has redefined the academic publishing industry by producing instructor-driven, student-centric learning materials for the higher education market. We collaborate with instructors and professionals to publish anthologies, original works, custom course materials, and interactive online learning activities that support learning objectives and provide students with authentic educational experiences.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grey-dog-media-usa.jpeg
Grey Dog Media
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cognella.jpeg
Cognella
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grey Dog Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cognella
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grey Dog Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cognella in 2025.

Incident History — Grey Dog Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grey Dog Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cognella (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cognella cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grey-dog-media-usa.jpeg
Grey Dog Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cognella.jpeg
Cognella
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cognella company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grey Dog Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cognella company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grey Dog Media company.

In the current year, Cognella company and Grey Dog Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cognella company nor Grey Dog Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cognella company nor Grey Dog Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cognella company nor Grey Dog Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grey Dog Media company nor Cognella company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grey Dog Media nor Cognella holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grey Dog Media company nor Cognella company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cognella company employs more people globally than Grey Dog Media company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Grey Dog Media nor Cognella holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grey Dog Media nor Cognella holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grey Dog Media nor Cognella holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grey Dog Media nor Cognella holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grey Dog Media nor Cognella holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grey Dog Media nor Cognella holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References