Comparison Overview

Gregory Mountain Products

VS

Soccer 2000

Gregory Mountain Products

4640 South Holladay Village Plaza, Suite 201, Salt Lake City, UT, US, 84117
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

For over 40 years we’ve been designing groundbreaking, long-lasting, human-powered products. Through clever and responsible innovation, taking substantive steps to measure and reduce our footprint, and providing gateway opportunities to get more people outside, we all end up in a better place – as people, as a brand, and as a planet. Whether you’re jet setting to a foreign country or kicking up dirt on the trail, our packs are built to power your experiences, no matter what they are. Gregory Mountain Products has been dedicated to innovating packs that fit a variety of outdoor experiences. Taking cutting-edge materials and progressive designs, as well as a comfortable and supportive fit, we continue to be industry leaders for performance in the outdoor gear industry.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Soccer 2000

224 Ogden Ave, Downers Grove, IL, 60515, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Soccer 2000 was started as a family business to fulfill our passion towards the sport of soccer. Over the years, we have shifted this passion towards our customers ensuring every visit to our store is a memorable one. Soccer 2000 specializes in soccer products - footwear, equipment, and team uniforms.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gregory-mountain-products.jpeg
Gregory Mountain Products
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soccer-2000.jpeg
Soccer 2000
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gregory Mountain Products
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Soccer 2000
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gregory Mountain Products in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Soccer 2000 in 2025.

Incident History — Gregory Mountain Products (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gregory Mountain Products cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Soccer 2000 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Soccer 2000 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gregory-mountain-products.jpeg
Gregory Mountain Products
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soccer-2000.jpeg
Soccer 2000
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Soccer 2000 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gregory Mountain Products company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Soccer 2000 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gregory Mountain Products company.

In the current year, Soccer 2000 company and Gregory Mountain Products company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Soccer 2000 company nor Gregory Mountain Products company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Soccer 2000 company nor Gregory Mountain Products company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Soccer 2000 company nor Gregory Mountain Products company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products company nor Soccer 2000 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products nor Soccer 2000 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products company nor Soccer 2000 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gregory Mountain Products company employs more people globally than Soccer 2000 company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products nor Soccer 2000 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products nor Soccer 2000 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products nor Soccer 2000 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products nor Soccer 2000 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products nor Soccer 2000 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gregory Mountain Products nor Soccer 2000 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H