Comparison Overview

Greenwich Sentinel

VS

Bookanory Publishing House

Greenwich Sentinel

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Greenwich Sentinel…our beloved community paper! The Greenwich Sentinel is a high-quality, weekly community newspaper with outstanding coverage of our town’s events, businesses, people, sports, food, health, and everything else that matters to us here in Greenwich, and is being read from 'cover to cover'! We are direct mailed to on Friday: →18,000 affluent homes in Greenwich, and 200 newsstands in Greenwich → Estimated readership of 58,000 individuals, → Estimated income of $225,000 → Estimated net worth of $1,720,000 Our website: → Receives over 5K+ hits per week and has a fully interactive edition with embedded videos Our Weekly Enews: → Over 6K+ subscribers in Greenwich receive our e-edition via email Our Daily e-Blast: → Your message can reach over 6K+ subscribers of The Sentinel in Greenwich, Our Facebook Page: → Over 3K Likes

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bookanory Publishing House

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Bookanory Publishing House centres on providing book services to self-publishing authors, professional authors and publishers. In particular, we provide: 1. High quality book cover graphic designs 2. Interior book formats. We specialise in Microsoft Word format design so that customers will be better placed to make their own post-published edits (assuming they write in Word). Our target market is predominantly (but not exclusively) self-publishing authors – on an online global basis. You may visit the main Bookanory web site at www.bookanory.com for further details and examples of our work. The company is directed by T. J. P. Campbell. His LinkedIn page is: https://www.linkedin.com/in/t-j-p-campbell-13017096

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenwich-sentinel.jpeg
Greenwich Sentinel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bookanory-publishing-house.jpeg
Bookanory Publishing House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greenwich Sentinel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bookanory Publishing House
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greenwich Sentinel in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bookanory Publishing House in 2025.

Incident History — Greenwich Sentinel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenwich Sentinel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bookanory Publishing House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bookanory Publishing House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenwich-sentinel.jpeg
Greenwich Sentinel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bookanory-publishing-house.jpeg
Bookanory Publishing House
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bookanory Publishing House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Greenwich Sentinel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bookanory Publishing House company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greenwich Sentinel company.

In the current year, Bookanory Publishing House company and Greenwich Sentinel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bookanory Publishing House company nor Greenwich Sentinel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bookanory Publishing House company nor Greenwich Sentinel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bookanory Publishing House company nor Greenwich Sentinel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel company nor Bookanory Publishing House company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel nor Bookanory Publishing House holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel company nor Bookanory Publishing House company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Greenwich Sentinel company employs more people globally than Bookanory Publishing House company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel nor Bookanory Publishing House holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel nor Bookanory Publishing House holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel nor Bookanory Publishing House holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel nor Bookanory Publishing House holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel nor Bookanory Publishing House holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greenwich Sentinel nor Bookanory Publishing House holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.