Comparison Overview

Greenwell Chisholm

VS

Color Incorporated

Greenwell Chisholm

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Greenwell Chisholm Printing Company, based in Owensboro, KY, just southeast of Evansville,IN, has had experience in print since 1919. Although starting out as a small local printer, Greenwell Chisholm has grown into a company that does business on a national level, with the latest in computer-to-plate technologies, new generation printing presses, variable data capabilities, full range of mailing services and full Internet capabilities. Greenwell Chisholm is ‘More Than Print!’ Our printing capabilities do not limit us to paper; at Greenwell Chisholm, we can put your logo on anything imaginable! While visiting our site, please take a look at our promotions portfolio and view the many types of products we are capable of printing. Along with our new Cross Media Marketing capabilities, we can take your business to new heights!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Color Incorporated

1600 Flower St., None, Glendale, CA, US, 91201
Last Update: 2025-12-12

With over 40 years of graphic arts experience, Color Incorporated knows how to deliver the quality and service you’re looking for. From offset printing to online proofing, 3D imaging to digital printing, Color Inc. has evolved to satisfy the changing needs of today's high-tech graphic arts industry. Our full-time consultants and print specialists are always there to offer solutions.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenwell-chisholm.jpeg
Greenwell Chisholm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/color-incorporated.jpeg
Color Incorporated
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greenwell Chisholm
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Color Incorporated
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greenwell Chisholm in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Color Incorporated in 2025.

Incident History — Greenwell Chisholm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenwell Chisholm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Color Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Color Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenwell-chisholm.jpeg
Greenwell Chisholm
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/color-incorporated.jpeg
Color Incorporated
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Greenwell Chisholm company and Color Incorporated company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Color Incorporated company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greenwell Chisholm company.

In the current year, Color Incorporated company and Greenwell Chisholm company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Color Incorporated company nor Greenwell Chisholm company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Color Incorporated company nor Greenwell Chisholm company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Color Incorporated company nor Greenwell Chisholm company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm company nor Color Incorporated company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm nor Color Incorporated holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm company nor Color Incorporated company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Greenwell Chisholm company employs more people globally than Color Incorporated company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm nor Color Incorporated holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm nor Color Incorporated holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm nor Color Incorporated holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm nor Color Incorporated holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm nor Color Incorporated holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greenwell Chisholm nor Color Incorporated holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N