Comparison Overview

Greenvelope.com

VS

VINCI Energies

Greenvelope.com

1620 4th Ave, Suite #200, Seattle, 98101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://http://www.greenvelope.com

Greenvelope strives to deliver the most elegant electronic invitation service by emulating the experience of opening a "traditional" printed invitation. By creating a positive online experience, Greenvelope hopes more hosts will consider sending invitations electronically for formal events – to help save trees, and additionally save time and money. To express Greenvelope's commitment towards this goal, they donate a significant percentage of every sale to Mountains to Sounds, a non-profit organization that maintains forests. Together we can invite​ a greener future.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

VINCI Energies

2169, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vinci-energies.com

In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutions, from design to implementation, operation and maintenance. With their strong local roots and agile and innovative structure, VINCI Energies’ 2,100 business units have positioned themselves at the heart of the energy choices of their customers, boosting the reliability, efficiency and sustainability of their infrastructure and processes. VINCI Energies strives for global performance, caring for the planet, useful to people and committed to local communities. 2024: €20.4 billion // 102,600 employees // 2,100 Business Units // 61 countries

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 24,873
Subsidiaries: 109
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenvelope-llc.jpeg
Greenvelope.com
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-energies.jpeg
VINCI Energies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greenvelope.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VINCI Energies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

Greenvelope.com has 71.43% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Energies in 2026.

Incident History — Greenvelope.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenvelope.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VINCI Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenvelope-llc.jpeg
Greenvelope.com
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing emails, Malicious links, Stolen credentials
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-energies.jpeg
VINCI Energies
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VINCI Energies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Greenvelope.com company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Greenvelope.com and VINCI Energies have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Greenvelope.com company has reported more cyber incidents than VINCI Energies company.

VINCI Energies company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Greenvelope.com company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VINCI Energies company nor Greenvelope.com company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Greenvelope.com company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while VINCI Energies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Greenvelope.com company nor VINCI Energies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor VINCI Energies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI Energies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Greenvelope.com company.

VINCI Energies company employs more people globally than Greenvelope.com company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor VINCI Energies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor VINCI Energies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor VINCI Energies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor VINCI Energies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor VINCI Energies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor VINCI Energies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References