Comparison Overview

Greenstein & McDonald, P.C.

VS

Triangle Law Group

Greenstein & McDonald, P.C.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Greenstein & McDonald P.C. is the most successful tenant law firm in the San Francisco Bay Area. We have secured more than $83,000,000 for our clients. Our financial success for our tenant clients is unprecedented. Experienced and aggressive, the lawyers of Greenstein & McDonald P.C. are dedicated to tenant justice, having already helped more than 20,000 tenants since 2001. Greenstein & McDonald P.C. has assisted tenants with eviction defense and other issues over the years, although our primary focus at this time involves suing landlords for the harm they cause to tenants.. Claims may include: failure to provide a habitable/livable unit, wrongful eviction, retaliation, discrimination, harassment, fire cases, wrongful death, breach of contract, nuisance (includes mold/lead paint), interference with quiet use and enjoyment, fraud, personal injuries, violating rent ordinances, or any other violation of the law by a landlord.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Triangle Law Group

3130 Fairhill Drive, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC, 27612, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Triangle Law Group, we take a different approach to solving issues for our clients, which is why our tagline is "Lawyers Who Think Outside the Box." Our attorneys look at our clients' problems from all angles. Triangle Law Group lawyers seek to find creative solutions to resolve matters in an efficient, cost-effective manner. When lawsuits are involved, we look for nontraditional options to address our clients' legal issues, without resorting to trial. We work with individuals and businesses, and all clients get the same degree of attention and service. We handle cases of all sizes, ranging from small matters in small claims court to large-dollar cases in all state Courts and federal court.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Greenstein & McDonald, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triangle-law-group.jpeg
Triangle Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greenstein & McDonald, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Triangle Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Triangle Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Triangle Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Triangle Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Greenstein & McDonald, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triangle-law-group.jpeg
Triangle Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Triangle Law Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Triangle Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company.

In the current year, Triangle Law Group company and Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Triangle Law Group company nor Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Triangle Law Group company nor Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Triangle Law Group company nor Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company nor Triangle Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. nor Triangle Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company nor Triangle Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Triangle Law Group company employs more people globally than Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. nor Triangle Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. nor Triangle Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. nor Triangle Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. nor Triangle Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. nor Triangle Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greenstein & McDonald, P.C. nor Triangle Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X