Comparison Overview

GreenRoom Inc.

VS

McFarland PLLC

GreenRoom Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Headquartered in Denver, GreenRoom caters to digital creators, influencers, entrepreneurs, and new media businesses. Whether you’re a children’s entertainer, lifestyle creator, pro-gamer or a company new to influencer marketing, we will not only represent you, but we will help you thrive in the ever-changing world of new media. We bring experience and professionalism to every matter and customize our support to your individual needs and concerns.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McFarland PLLC

811 Louisiana St., Suite 2520, Houston, TX, 77002, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Trial lawyers focusing on eminent domain, condemnation, and valuation litigation. McFarland PLLC represents property owners in maximizing compensation when governmental or public-use entities attempt to take private property for public use. While our experience has included takings projects for highway expansion, pipelines, electric transmission lines, and flood control, our principal practice is focused on highway and roadway widening projects impacting retail, commercial, industrial, and special-use properties. Firm founder Charles McFarland has been selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® in the practice area of Eminent Domain and Condemnation Law and Texas Super Lawyers for Eminent Domain. Charles additionally has the AV Preeminent Rating, Martindale-Hubbell's highest possible rating for both ethical standards and legal ability.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenroom-inc.jpeg
GreenRoom Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcfarland-pllc.jpeg
McFarland PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GreenRoom Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McFarland PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GreenRoom Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McFarland PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — GreenRoom Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GreenRoom Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McFarland PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McFarland PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenroom-inc.jpeg
GreenRoom Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcfarland-pllc.jpeg
McFarland PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GreenRoom Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McFarland PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, McFarland PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GreenRoom Inc. company.

In the current year, McFarland PLLC company and GreenRoom Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McFarland PLLC company nor GreenRoom Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McFarland PLLC company nor GreenRoom Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McFarland PLLC company nor GreenRoom Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. company nor McFarland PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. nor McFarland PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. company nor McFarland PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McFarland PLLC company employs more people globally than GreenRoom Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. nor McFarland PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. nor McFarland PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. nor McFarland PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. nor McFarland PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. nor McFarland PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. nor McFarland PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X