Comparison Overview

Green Eco Technologies

VS

Augean

Green Eco Technologies

1-3 Molan St, Ringwood, Victoria, 3134, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Green Eco Technologies (GET) develops, supplies and manages innovative, efficient, and environmentally beneficial, on-site solutions for the conversion and re-purposing of food waste into reusable resources. Contact us at [email protected]. The company’s WasteMaster food conversion system uses unique proprietary technology to convert and reduce food waste, without additives or water, into a residual material which can be re-used in positive ways such as the production of green energy through anaerobic digestion. With offices and manufacturing sited in the UK and Australia, as well as representation in the United States, the United Arab Emirates, Singapore and Spain, GET supports customers to reduce the impact of food waste disposal both on their businesses and the Environment.

NAICS: 562
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Augean

4 Rudgate Court, Wetherby, undefined, LS23 7BF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Augean specialises in managing hard to handle wastes. We have UK waste treatment and disposal infrastructure, and we focus on delivering best environmental outcomes. We service the Renewable Energy, Infrastructure and Construction, Nuclear and Radioactive, Processing and Manufacturing, and Oil and Gas Sectors. Acquired by Augean in 2023, Future Industrial Services is a UK market leader and provides Specialist Industrial Cleaning, decommissioning and decontamination for the Energy, Petrochemical, Manufacturing, Utilities, and Cement sectors throughout the UK. Please contact us on: Tel: 0333 034 9004 Email: [email protected] Website: www.augean.co.uk

NAICS: 5622
NAICS Definition: Waste Treatment and Disposal
Employees: 278
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenecotec.jpeg
Green Eco Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augean-plc.jpeg
Augean
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Green Eco Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Augean
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Waste Treatment and Disposal Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Green Eco Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Waste Treatment and Disposal Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Augean in 2025.

Incident History — Green Eco Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green Eco Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Augean (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Augean cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenecotec.jpeg
Green Eco Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augean-plc.jpeg
Augean
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Augean company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Green Eco Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Augean company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Green Eco Technologies company.

In the current year, Augean company and Green Eco Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Augean company nor Green Eco Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Augean company nor Green Eco Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Augean company nor Green Eco Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Green Eco Technologies company nor Augean company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Green Eco Technologies nor Augean holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Green Eco Technologies company nor Augean company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Augean company employs more people globally than Green Eco Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Waste Treatment and Disposal.

Neither Green Eco Technologies nor Augean holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Green Eco Technologies nor Augean holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Green Eco Technologies nor Augean holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Green Eco Technologies nor Augean holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Green Eco Technologies nor Augean holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Green Eco Technologies nor Augean holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H