Comparison Overview

Greenbrier Valley Theatre

VS

Prospect Musicals

Greenbrier Valley Theatre

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gvtheatre.org

Located in beautiful, historic downtown Lewisburg, “America’s Coolest Small Town,” Greenbrier Valley Theatre is committed to its mission: to create live, professional quality theatre in West Virginia and through theatre to enlighten, enrich and enliven the life of our region. Throughout each year, GVT produces first-class theatrical productions featuring professional actors. Additionally, Greenbrier Valley Theatre offers a successful after-school drama program, a summer camp for children and teens, literary readings, special events and musical performances, art appreciation activities, lectures, discussions and workshops. Greenbrier Valley Theatre’s growth has not gone unnoticed as, in 2006, it was officially named The State Professional Theatre of West Virginia.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Prospect Musicals

520 8TH Ave LBBY 3, New York, New York, 10018, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://www.prospectmusicals.org/

Prospect Musicals (aka Prospect Theater Company) is an NYC-based non-profit organization, was founded in 1998 and is dedicated to dedicated to fostering and showcasing today's new voices shaping tomorrow's musicals. We develop and produce new works, envisioned and implemented by emerging and mid-career artists working in diverse genres and styles. Prospect creates educational and professional training opportunities, and sustains a supportive network within the field. We provide a forum for artists and audiences to connect and learn from each other, and we foster the work of a vibrant community working to advance the art form of musical theater in the 21st Century. We value thought-provoking work, which resonates in the heart.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenbrier-valley-theatre.jpeg
Greenbrier Valley Theatre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prospect-theater-company-inc.jpeg
Prospect Musicals
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greenbrier Valley Theatre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prospect Musicals
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greenbrier Valley Theatre in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prospect Musicals in 2025.

Incident History — Greenbrier Valley Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenbrier Valley Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prospect Musicals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prospect Musicals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenbrier-valley-theatre.jpeg
Greenbrier Valley Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prospect-theater-company-inc.jpeg
Prospect Musicals
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Greenbrier Valley Theatre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prospect Musicals company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prospect Musicals company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greenbrier Valley Theatre company.

In the current year, Prospect Musicals company and Greenbrier Valley Theatre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prospect Musicals company nor Greenbrier Valley Theatre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prospect Musicals company nor Greenbrier Valley Theatre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prospect Musicals company nor Greenbrier Valley Theatre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre company nor Prospect Musicals company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre nor Prospect Musicals holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre company nor Prospect Musicals company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Greenbrier Valley Theatre company employs more people globally than Prospect Musicals company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre nor Prospect Musicals holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre nor Prospect Musicals holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre nor Prospect Musicals holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre nor Prospect Musicals holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre nor Prospect Musicals holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greenbrier Valley Theatre nor Prospect Musicals holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References