Comparison Overview

Greenberg Traurig Poland

VS

FOX & LAPENNE

Greenberg Traurig Poland

ul. Chmielna, 69, Warszawa, Woj. Mazowieckie, PL, 00-801
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Greenberg Traurig’s Warsaw office offers a broad range of capabilities. Our strength in Poland derives from over 30 years of experience in advising on the largest and most significant transactions and disputes in the country. Our Polish practice provides legal services in mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, real estate, private equity, project finance, tax, litigation, arbitration and bankruptcy proceedings, competition and antitrust, asset securitization, privatizations, and financial restructurings, as well as labor law and intellectual property. We have experience across a wide range of industry sectors, including banking and finance, energy and mining, telecommunications, media, medical and healthcare real estate, aviation, TMT, and manufacturing. Our clients include leading Polish and multinational financial institutions and companies. Our Warsaw office is regularly recognized as a leading law firm in Poland, including being honored with the following awards: Poland Firm of the Year Award at the Euromoney Legal Media Group "Women in Business Law Awards 2021 Europe", IFLR 2021, 2019 and 2018 "Law Firm of the Year Award for Poland", Chambers Europe 2017's “Law Firm of the Year in Poland” and Chambers Europe 2016's “Law Firm of the Year for Client Service in Poland.” Chambers Global, Chambers Europe, IFLR1000, and EMEA Legal 500 consistently rank our Warsaw office in the top tiers in the areas of Corporate/M&A, Capital Markets, Real Estate, Private Equity, Tax, Banking and Finance, Competition, Energy, Dispute Resolution, and TMT.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 123
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FOX & LAPENNE

Pedro Murillo 6136, Montevideo, undefined, 11500, UY
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The firm was founded as of July 12, 1944. Since then, the firm advised local and international clients on IP and trade matters and has gained its reputation as one of the Top firms in Intellectual Property throughout South America. Within the IP field, the firm has a vast experience filling trademark applications, patent applications, utility patents applications, industrial designs, copyright applications and plant applications. The firm also counsel clients on any other IP issue and advice clients the best strategy to follow to protect and enforce clients rights in a fast and cost-effective manner. The firm offers trade law services to its clients and assists them with the local requirements they will need to comply with in order to operate in the Uruguayan jurisdiction. A litigation department is well established in the firm and it counts with several attorneys with a large expertise working with the litigation of cases before the Uruguayan courts. The legal department has also filed claims against State decisions when they are deemed to be illegal and affected in any possible manner the interests of the firm’s clients. Translating Department The firm has the biggest Uruguayan Translating Department. This department was created to assist the legal department but currently it has its own existence and its own clients. All of its translators are certified translators with a large expertise with legal and patent documents, among others. Clients The firm has clients in the following areas: pharmaceutical companies, nutrition companies, health and wellness companies, entertainment companies, sportswear and clothing companies, consumer goods companies, banks, amongst others. Languages The firm working languages are English and Spanish. However, the Translating Department deals with the following languages: English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian and German.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenberg-traurig-poland.jpeg
Greenberg Traurig Poland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-&-lapenne.jpeg
FOX & LAPENNE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greenberg Traurig Poland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FOX & LAPENNE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greenberg Traurig Poland in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FOX & LAPENNE in 2025.

Incident History — Greenberg Traurig Poland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenberg Traurig Poland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FOX & LAPENNE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FOX & LAPENNE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenberg-traurig-poland.jpeg
Greenberg Traurig Poland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-&-lapenne.jpeg
FOX & LAPENNE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Greenberg Traurig Poland company and FOX & LAPENNE company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, FOX & LAPENNE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greenberg Traurig Poland company.

In the current year, FOX & LAPENNE company and Greenberg Traurig Poland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FOX & LAPENNE company nor Greenberg Traurig Poland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FOX & LAPENNE company nor Greenberg Traurig Poland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FOX & LAPENNE company nor Greenberg Traurig Poland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland company nor FOX & LAPENNE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland nor FOX & LAPENNE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland company nor FOX & LAPENNE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Greenberg Traurig Poland company employs more people globally than FOX & LAPENNE company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland nor FOX & LAPENNE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland nor FOX & LAPENNE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland nor FOX & LAPENNE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland nor FOX & LAPENNE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland nor FOX & LAPENNE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greenberg Traurig Poland nor FOX & LAPENNE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X