Comparison Overview

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

VS

Dentons Rodyk

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

One Vanderbilt Ave., None, New York, New York, US, 10017
Last Update: 2025-09-04 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 2,850 attorneys across 49 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firmโ€™s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI โ€œBest of the Best Recommended Law Firmโ€ by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.

NAICS: 54111
NAICS Definition: Offices of Lawyers
Employees: 5,326
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dentons Rodyk

UOB Plaza 1 #33-00 Singapore, 048624, SG
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Trusted since 1861, Dentons Rodyk is Singapore's global law firm with a team of more than 200 lawyers offering clients a full suite of legal services necessary to do business locally and globally. We regularly represent a diverse clientele across a broad spectrum of industries and practice areas. Consistently ranked highly in leading publications, we pride ourselves on providing the highest quality advice to our clients while maintaining strong working relationships with key public sector agencies and leading organisations in the private sector. Our combination with global law firm Dentons, a leader on the Acritas Global Elite Law Firm Brand Index, created the dominant global law firm in the Pacific Rim with over 85 offices in the region. With 10,000 lawyers serving 78 countries, the Firm offers clients the benefit of quality experience in and of the communities in which they want to do business or resolve a disputeโ€šร„รฎfrom Canada and the United States, across Europe, the United Kingdom, the Middle East and Africa, and throughout the Asia Pacific region. We are also part of Dentons ASEAN, the first global pan-ASEAN law firm with an established history in Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore and Vietnam. We will continue to grow our presence through combinations with exceptional local firms across the ASEAN region and help clients navigate change wherever they are located.

NAICS: 54111
NAICS Definition: Offices of Lawyers
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenberg-traurig-llp.jpeg
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentons-rodyk.jpeg
Dentons Rodyk
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dentons Rodyk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greenberg Traurig, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dentons Rodyk in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Greenberg Traurig, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenberg Traurig, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Dentons Rodyk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dentons Rodyk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenberg-traurig-llp.jpeg
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentons-rodyk.jpeg
Dentons Rodyk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Greenberg Traurig, LLP company and Dentons Rodyk company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Dentons Rodyk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greenberg Traurig, LLP company.

In the current year, Dentons Rodyk company and Greenberg Traurig, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dentons Rodyk company nor Greenberg Traurig, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dentons Rodyk company nor Greenberg Traurig, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dentons Rodyk company nor Greenberg Traurig, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greenberg Traurig, LLP company nor Dentons Rodyk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dentons Rodyk company.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP company employs more people globally than Dentons Rodyk company, reflecting its scale as a Law Practice.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X