Comparison Overview

Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark

VS

Detroit Science Center

Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark

500 25th St, Brooklyn, New York, 11232, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1838 and now a National Historic Landmark, Green-Wood was one of the first rural cemeteries in America. By the early 1860s, it had earned an international reputation for its magnificent beauty and became the prestigious place to be buried, attracting 500,000 visitors a year, second only to Niagara Falls as the nation’s greatest tourist attraction. Crowds flocked there to enjoy family outings, carriage rides, and sculpture viewing in the finest of first generation American landscapes. Green-Wood’s popularity helped inspire the creation of public parks, including New York City’s Central and Prospect Parks. Green-Wood is 478 spectacular acres of hills, valleys, glacial ponds and paths, throughout which exists one of the largest outdoor collections of 19th- and 20th-century statuary and mausoleums. Four seasons of beauty from century-and-a-half-old trees offer a peaceful oasis to visitors, as well as its 560,000 permanent residents, including Leonard Bernstein, Boss Tweed, Charles Ebbets, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Louis Comfort Tiffany, Horace Greeley, Civil War generals, baseball legends, politicians, artists, entertainers and inventors.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Detroit Science Center

None
Last Update: 2026-01-18

The Detroit Science Center is a 501(c)3 private not-for-profit insitution which operates a 120,000 square foot hands-on museum facility at 5020 John R Street in Detroit, MI. It includes 80,000 square feet of exhibits, five different theaters and stages including the Chrysler IMAX Dome Theatre, the Dassault Systemes Planetarium and the Toyota Engineering 4D Theater and multiple, educational, scout, camp and outreach programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-wood-cemetery.jpeg
Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/detroit-science-center.jpeg
Detroit Science Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Detroit Science Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Detroit Science Center in 2026.

Incident History — Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Detroit Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Detroit Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-wood-cemetery.jpeg
Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/detroit-science-center.jpeg
Detroit Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company and Detroit Science Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Detroit Science Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company.

In the current year, Detroit Science Center company and Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Detroit Science Center company nor Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Detroit Science Center company nor Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Detroit Science Center company nor Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company nor Detroit Science Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark nor Detroit Science Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company nor Detroit Science Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark company employs more people globally than Detroit Science Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark nor Detroit Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark nor Detroit Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark nor Detroit Science Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark nor Detroit Science Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark nor Detroit Science Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Green-Wood, a National Historic Landmark nor Detroit Science Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H