Comparison Overview

Green Mistretta Law

VS

Lawyers for Human Rights

Green Mistretta Law

1752 Heritage Center Dr, Suite 101, Wake Forest, North Carolina, US, 27587
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Green Mistretta Law was founded on a simple philosophy: gather the best litigators with a history of excellent trial performance and outstanding client service and unite them in one standout boutique practice. As a boutique litigation firm, we are able to provide premier legal services by recognized lawyers in a responsive and efficient manner.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lawyers for Human Rights

357 Visagie Street, Pretoria, 0001, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Lawyers for Human Rights is an independent human rights organisation with a thirty-year track record of human rights activism and public interest litigation in South Africa. LHR uses the law as a positive instrument for change and to deepen the democratisation of the South African society. To this end, it provides free legal services to vulnerable, marginalised and indigent individuals and communities, both non-national and South African, who are victims of unlawful infringements of their Constitutional rights

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-mistretta-law.jpeg
Green Mistretta Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawyers-for-human-rights.jpeg
Lawyers for Human Rights
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Green Mistretta Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lawyers for Human Rights
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Green Mistretta Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lawyers for Human Rights in 2025.

Incident History — Green Mistretta Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green Mistretta Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lawyers for Human Rights (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lawyers for Human Rights cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-mistretta-law.jpeg
Green Mistretta Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawyers-for-human-rights.jpeg
Lawyers for Human Rights
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lawyers for Human Rights company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Green Mistretta Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lawyers for Human Rights company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Green Mistretta Law company.

In the current year, Lawyers for Human Rights company and Green Mistretta Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lawyers for Human Rights company nor Green Mistretta Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lawyers for Human Rights company nor Green Mistretta Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lawyers for Human Rights company nor Green Mistretta Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Green Mistretta Law company nor Lawyers for Human Rights company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Green Mistretta Law nor Lawyers for Human Rights holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Green Mistretta Law company nor Lawyers for Human Rights company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lawyers for Human Rights company employs more people globally than Green Mistretta Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Green Mistretta Law nor Lawyers for Human Rights holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Green Mistretta Law nor Lawyers for Human Rights holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Green Mistretta Law nor Lawyers for Human Rights holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Green Mistretta Law nor Lawyers for Human Rights holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Green Mistretta Law nor Lawyers for Human Rights holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Green Mistretta Law nor Lawyers for Human Rights holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X