Comparison Overview

Green and Spiegel

VS

OpenMikeDetroit

Green and Spiegel

150 York St, Toronto, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

With offices in Toronto (Canada), Philadelphia (Pennsylvania) and Providence (Rhode Island), and Vail (Colorado), Green and Spiegel is a boutique immigration law firm that boasts a legal team of experts in all categories of North American immigration law. With some of the top experts in dealing with corporate employee transfers, adoptions and inadmissibility issues, the professionals at Green and Spiegel are truly leaders in the industry. For over 40 years, the lawyers at Green and Spiegel have successfully handled large corporate employee transfers, challenging court cases, as well as difficult family sponsorships and humanitarian and compassionate applications for permanent residence. The legal team at Green and Spiegel is dedicated to client service and at the forefront of legislative and policy changes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 198
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OpenMikeDetroit

24901 Northwestern Hwy #700,, Southfield, 48075, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

A podcast dedicated to providing truthful information on legal topics. It's sometimes raw, sometimes controversial, and is always entertaining and helpful. The podcast is geared toward everyday people who are looking for insight on the law and a unique perspective on current news stories. The host, attorney Mike Morse, is a groundbreaking leader in Michigan’s legal community who has over 25 years of experience in the courtroom and is also a highly-successful entrepreneur, having founded the largest personal injury law firm in Michigan.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-&-spiegel.jpeg
Green and Spiegel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/openmikedetroit.jpeg
OpenMikeDetroit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Green and Spiegel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OpenMikeDetroit
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Green and Spiegel in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OpenMikeDetroit in 2025.

Incident History — Green and Spiegel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green and Spiegel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OpenMikeDetroit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OpenMikeDetroit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-&-spiegel.jpeg
Green and Spiegel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/openmikedetroit.jpeg
OpenMikeDetroit
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OpenMikeDetroit company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Green and Spiegel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OpenMikeDetroit company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Green and Spiegel company.

In the current year, OpenMikeDetroit company and Green and Spiegel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OpenMikeDetroit company nor Green and Spiegel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OpenMikeDetroit company nor Green and Spiegel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OpenMikeDetroit company nor Green and Spiegel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Green and Spiegel company nor OpenMikeDetroit company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Green and Spiegel nor OpenMikeDetroit holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

OpenMikeDetroit company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Green and Spiegel company.

Neither Green and Spiegel nor OpenMikeDetroit holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Green and Spiegel nor OpenMikeDetroit holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Green and Spiegel nor OpenMikeDetroit holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Green and Spiegel nor OpenMikeDetroit holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Green and Spiegel nor OpenMikeDetroit holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Green and Spiegel nor OpenMikeDetroit holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X