Comparison Overview

Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art

VS

RWA (Royal West of England Academy)

Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art

12001 Market Street, Reston, VA, 20190, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Mission Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art (Tephra ICA) is a non-profit, non-collecting institution committed to promoting innovative contemporary art and thinking. The word “tephra” – matter ejected from geothermal eruptions that lands upon, nourishes, and changes the surrounding environment - emphasizes the institution’s belief in the combustibility of creativity and the generation of ideas and growth that the arts can provide. We are devoted to celebrating artists and value the power of art to broaden perspectives, start difficult conversations, and consider alternative ideas. We work with artists, galleries, institutions, universities, thought leaders, and collectors globally. We rely on a variety of funding sources for programming, including memberships, sponsorships, grants, donations, and other fundraising efforts. We believe in illuminating, mirroring, and programming for the fullness of our shared world. Through collaborative and exploratory work, we create opportunity for important, complex dialogue. We are devoted to celebrating artists and value the power of art to generate new ideas and broaden perspectives. For a full list of our social and cultural equity commitments, please visit tephraica.org/about. Tephra ICA is W.A.G.E. Certified. Our Story Formally known as Greater Reston Arts Center (GRACE), the idea of Tephra ICA emerged as the institution’s programs, audience, and impact continued to evolve. We proudly reside in Reston, Virginia, whose founder, Robert E. Simon, insisted that it should be a place welcoming to all people and that it prioritize the arts as essential to a well-rounded life. Founded in 1974 as the Greater Reston Arts Center by local artists and residents committed to those ideas, Tephra ICA embraces the role of helping to fulfill and extend the original Reston vision.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RWA (Royal West of England Academy)

Queen's Road, Bristol, BS8 1PX, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-03
Between 750 and 799

The RWA is the UK’s only regional Royal Academy of Art. Like the Royal Academy in London, we have much in common with museums and other galleries, but we have a broader role – to promote not just the appreciation and understanding of art, but also its practice. The RWA’s vision is to be the South West’s leading centre for the exhibition, exploration and practice of the visual arts – recognized as a place that enriches and nourishes the lives of people from all communities and backgrounds – inspiring them with creativity. Our Academicians today are some of the country’s leading artists who help steer our vision and support our activities. Opened in 1858, we have a long heritage. The RWA’s main galleries have been described by art critic Andrew Lambirth, as “a jewel in the crown of England’s exhibiting spaces” and offer an inspiring space in which to present world-class exhibitions - and host events - and make accessible to the people of Bristol and the South West a calibre of exhibition rarely seen outside London. We offer exhibiting opportunities for artists through our Annual Open Exhibition. Support is given for early career and emerging artists through the Artist Network programme. Through our Learning and Participation Programme, we run regular family workshops at the RWA and Scribble and Sketch art ‘drop in’ sessions for adults and children in areas of multiple deprivation in Bristol, as well as supporting schools visits and Arts Award. The RWA Drawing School offers high quality courses and workshops for adults. We are an independent charity (registration number 1070163) and receive no public subsidy. With minimal unrestricted reserves we are reliant on the income we receive from visitors, Friends and Patrons and other supporters to continue our work.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greater-reston-arts-center.jpeg
Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-west-of-england-academy.jpeg
RWA (Royal West of England Academy)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RWA (Royal West of England Academy)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RWA (Royal West of England Academy) in 2026.

Incident History — Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RWA (Royal West of England Academy) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RWA (Royal West of England Academy) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greater-reston-arts-center.jpeg
Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-west-of-england-academy.jpeg
RWA (Royal West of England Academy)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company.

In the current year, RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company and Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company nor Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company nor Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company nor Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RWA (Royal West of England Academy) company employs more people globally than Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tephra Institute of Contemporary Art nor RWA (Royal West of England Academy) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N