Comparison Overview

Greater Boston Legal Services

VS

Good Call NYC

Greater Boston Legal Services

197 Friend St., Boston, 02114, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Greater Boston Legal Services (GBLS) plays an indispensable role in the lives of people living in poverty in the Boston area by providing free, high-quality civil (non-criminal) legal assistance to low-income individuals and families. GBLS helps its clients navigate a complex maze of laws and regulations, enabling them to assert their rights and secure the basic necessities of life. GBLS annually provides assistance to 11,000+ individual clients with over 14,000 cases.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 254
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Good Call NYC

7 Marcus Garvey Blvd, Brooklyn, NY, 11206, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Good Call is a community-centered tech nonprofit based in NYC working to disrupt the cycle of mass incarceration. The organization helps protect the rights of marginalized communities facing excessive and unnecessary arrests and unfair treatment by the criminal justice system. Through a free 24/7 hotline, youth programs, and community outreach, Good Call provides free proactive and/or immediate legal support for those arrested while educating and impacting their communities. Good Call is helping to develop the future tech to advance, support and improve the criminal justice system.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/good-call-nyc.jpeg
Good Call NYC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greater Boston Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Good Call NYC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greater Boston Legal Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Good Call NYC in 2025.

Incident History — Greater Boston Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greater Boston Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Good Call NYC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Good Call NYC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greater-boston-legal-services.jpeg
Greater Boston Legal Services
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/good-call-nyc.jpeg
Good Call NYC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Greater Boston Legal Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Good Call NYC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Good Call NYC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greater Boston Legal Services company.

In the current year, Good Call NYC company and Greater Boston Legal Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Good Call NYC company nor Greater Boston Legal Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Good Call NYC company nor Greater Boston Legal Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Good Call NYC company nor Greater Boston Legal Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services company nor Good Call NYC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services nor Good Call NYC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services company nor Good Call NYC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Greater Boston Legal Services company employs more people globally than Good Call NYC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services nor Good Call NYC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services nor Good Call NYC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services nor Good Call NYC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services nor Good Call NYC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services nor Good Call NYC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greater Boston Legal Services nor Good Call NYC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X