Comparison Overview

Great Clips Inc.

VS

Haleon

Great Clips Inc.

4400 W. 78th St., Minneapolis, MN, 55435, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Established in Minneapolis in 1982, Great Clips has grown to be the world's largest and fastest growing salon brand. There are more than 4,400 salons throughout the United States and Canada -- all of them owned by franchisees. Visit us at www.greatclips.com Employment Information for Corporate Employees: - Competitive medical, dental, flexible spending and disability benefits - Flexible work options like compressed work weeks, and telecommuting - Award-winning wellness programs and tuition assistance - View corporate opportunities at: https://jobs.greatclips.com/corporate Stylists/Salon Managers can find employment information at: https://jobs.greatclips.com For more information on Great Clips franchises, visit www.GreatClipsFranchise.com

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 11,548
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Haleon

Weybridge, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

You have loved and trusted our brands for over 170 years. We have a clear purpose, to deliver better everyday health with humanity. 💚 Our category-leading brands include Sensodyne, Panadol, Centrum, TUMS, Advil, Otrivin and Voltaren. We combine deep human understanding and trusted science to make everyday health more inclusive, more achievable and more sustainable. Want to learn more about us? Follow to stay up to date!

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greatclips.jpeg
Great Clips Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haleon.jpeg
Haleon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Great Clips Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Haleon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Clips Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Haleon in 2025.

Incident History — Great Clips Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Clips Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Haleon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Haleon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greatclips.jpeg
Great Clips Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haleon.jpeg
Haleon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Haleon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Great Clips Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Haleon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Great Clips Inc. company.

In the current year, Haleon company and Great Clips Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Haleon company nor Great Clips Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Haleon company nor Great Clips Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Haleon company nor Great Clips Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Great Clips Inc. company nor Haleon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Haleon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Haleon company and Great Clips Inc. company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Great Clips Inc. company employs more people globally than Haleon company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Haleon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Haleon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Haleon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Haleon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Haleon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Haleon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.