Comparison Overview

Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.

VS

Miniature Precision Components

Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.

No. 2266, Chaoyang South Avenue, BAODING, HE | Hebei, 71000, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Great Wall Motor Company Limited is China’s largest SUV and pickup manufacturer, selling over a million SUVs a year and realizing $15 billion in annual revenue, with four vehicle manufacturing bases, over 40 holding subsidiaries, and more than 70,000 employees. Great Wall Motors has three brands— Haval, Great Wall and WEY; all committed to "focus, dedication and specialization"​ while pursuing "customer satisfaction"​ and "market leadership."​ For more information, please visit us at http://www.gwm.com.cn/.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8,168
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Miniature Precision Components

150 Wisconsin St. Walworth, WI 53184, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Miniature Precision Components (MPC, Inc.) was originally founded in 1972 as a family business in Walworth, WI, having grown to over 1,500 employees operating in the United States and Mexico. In February 2019, MPC joined the Novares Team (www.novaresteam.com) as a leader in global plastic solutions that designs & manufactures complex components & systems serving the future of the automotive industry. Novares produces cutting edge automotive parts and specializes in technical plastic injection that contributes to cleaner, lighter, more connected, and user-friendly vehicles. The Novares Team provides engineering and manufacturing expertise to virtually every OEM and many Tier-1 companies in the automotive industry. Headquartered in France, the Novares Team includes more than 12,000 employees and has a presence in 22 countries with 47 Plants, 8 Skill Centers, 7 Technical Centers, 19 Customer Service Centers and more than 15 languages spoken. Be sure to visit our website and follow us on LinkedIn and Facebook to see how Novares is Beyond Plastic...

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-wall-motor-co-ltd-.jpeg
Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miniature-precision-components.jpeg
Miniature Precision Components
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Miniature Precision Components
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automotive Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Automotive Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Miniature Precision Components in 2025.

Incident History — Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Miniature Precision Components (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Miniature Precision Components cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-wall-motor-co-ltd-.jpeg
Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miniature-precision-components.jpeg
Miniature Precision Components
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Miniature Precision Components company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Miniature Precision Components company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company.

In the current year, Miniature Precision Components company and Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Miniature Precision Components company nor Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Miniature Precision Components company nor Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Miniature Precision Components company nor Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company nor Miniature Precision Components company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. nor Miniature Precision Components holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Miniature Precision Components company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company.

Miniature Precision Components company employs more people globally than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Automotive.

Neither Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. nor Miniature Precision Components holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. nor Miniature Precision Components holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. nor Miniature Precision Components holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. nor Miniature Precision Components holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. nor Miniature Precision Components holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. nor Miniature Precision Components holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H