Comparison Overview

Great Rivers United Way

VS

Grassroots Analytics

Great Rivers United Way

1855 Main St E, Onalaska, Wisconsin, 54650, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Great Rivers United Way is working to advance the common good within our seven-county region by narrowing its focus to three Strategic Objectives: • Positively impact our youngest community members • Stabilize household economic situations so people experience thriving lives • Support a healthy and socially-connected community Everyone deserves opportunities to have a good life: a quality education that leads to a stable job, enough income to support a family through retirement, and good health. Advancing the common good is less about helping one person at a time and more about changing systems to help all of us. We are all connected and interdependent. We all win when a child succeeds in school, when families are financially stable, when people are healthy. Great Rivers United Way’s goal is to create long-lasting changes by addressing the underlying causes of these problems. Living United means being a part of the change. It takes everyone in the community working together to create a brighter future. Give. Advocate. Volunteer. LIVE UNITED. Watch our latest campaign video: https://youtu.be/_46r7TVs0yw.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grassroots Analytics

806 7th St NW, Washington, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21

Grassroots Analytics breaks down barriers to civic and community engagement by building tech tools for left-leaning candidates, causes, and social good nonprofit organizations. Founded in 2017, Grassroots Analytics quickly grew into a leading progressive technology firm with top political, nonprofit, and tech talent. Through a uniquely collaborative workplace, our team produces record innovation. During the 2022 cycle, Grassroots Analytics supported over 1,000 campaigns and organizations across all 50 states.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-rivers-united-way.jpeg
Great Rivers United Way
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grassrootsanalytics.jpeg
Grassroots Analytics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Great Rivers United Way
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grassroots Analytics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Rivers United Way in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grassroots Analytics in 2025.

Incident History — Great Rivers United Way (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Rivers United Way cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grassroots Analytics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grassroots Analytics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-rivers-united-way.jpeg
Great Rivers United Way
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grassrootsanalytics.jpeg
Grassroots Analytics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grassroots Analytics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Great Rivers United Way company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grassroots Analytics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Great Rivers United Way company.

In the current year, Grassroots Analytics company and Great Rivers United Way company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grassroots Analytics company nor Great Rivers United Way company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grassroots Analytics company nor Great Rivers United Way company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grassroots Analytics company nor Great Rivers United Way company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Great Rivers United Way company nor Grassroots Analytics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Great Rivers United Way nor Grassroots Analytics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Great Rivers United Way company nor Grassroots Analytics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grassroots Analytics company employs more people globally than Great Rivers United Way company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Great Rivers United Way nor Grassroots Analytics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Great Rivers United Way nor Grassroots Analytics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Great Rivers United Way nor Grassroots Analytics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Great Rivers United Way nor Grassroots Analytics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Great Rivers United Way nor Grassroots Analytics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Great Rivers United Way nor Grassroots Analytics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N