Comparison Overview

Great Plains Zoo

VS

Chicago Humanities

Great Plains Zoo

805 S. Kiwanis Ave., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Great Plains Zoo & Delbridge Museum of Natural History is a non-profit organization dedicated to fostering a greater understanding of our natural world through education, conservation, recreation and discovery. The Great Plains Zoo is an accredited member of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) – a leader in wildlife conservation. Fewer than 10% of animal institutions in the United States have met the high standards for AZA accreditation. Open 361 days a year, the Great Plains Zoo & Delbridge Museum of Natural History is home to more than 1,000 animals from 137 species including 24 endangered species, and teaches 40,000 kids and families in unique, experience-based education programs each year. The 45-acre park offers up-close views to animals often not found in larger Zoos including Tigers, Rhinos, Bears, Primates, Giraffe, and an award-winning Snow Monkey exhibit. The Zoo also includes the Delbridge Museum of Natural History, a rare collection of 150 mounted animals including 38 “vanishing species.”

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chicago Humanities

500 N Dearborn St, Ste 825, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60654
Last Update: 2025-12-02

For 30 years, Chicago Humanities has been giving Chicagoans from all neighborhoods, means, and abilities, access to the day’s most thoughtful writers, scientists, artists, musicians, policymakers, public intellectuals, influencers, and activists. Chicago Humanities produces more than 150 public events annually, from Evanston to Englewood, Wicker Park to South Shore. Its CHF’s belief that by bringing people together in engaging spaces across the city, Chicagoans from all walks of life have the opportunity to enjoy a deeper appreciation for what makes our city unique, the complexities of the wider world, and the root causes of and solutions to issues affecting their lives.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-plains-zoo-and-delbridge-museum.jpeg
Great Plains Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-humanities.jpeg
Chicago Humanities
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Great Plains Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chicago Humanities
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Plains Zoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Humanities in 2025.

Incident History — Great Plains Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Plains Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chicago Humanities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Humanities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-plains-zoo-and-delbridge-museum.jpeg
Great Plains Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-humanities.jpeg
Chicago Humanities
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Great Plains Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Humanities company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chicago Humanities company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Great Plains Zoo company.

In the current year, Chicago Humanities company and Great Plains Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chicago Humanities company nor Great Plains Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chicago Humanities company nor Great Plains Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chicago Humanities company nor Great Plains Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Great Plains Zoo company nor Chicago Humanities company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Great Plains Zoo nor Chicago Humanities holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Great Plains Zoo company nor Chicago Humanities company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Great Plains Zoo company employs more people globally than Chicago Humanities company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Great Plains Zoo nor Chicago Humanities holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Great Plains Zoo nor Chicago Humanities holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Great Plains Zoo nor Chicago Humanities holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Great Plains Zoo nor Chicago Humanities holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Great Plains Zoo nor Chicago Humanities holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Great Plains Zoo nor Chicago Humanities holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X