Comparison Overview

GPI / GPRO

VS

Avik Services, LLC.

GPI / GPRO

5252 East 36th Street North, Wichita, Kansas, 67220, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Great Plains Industries proudly manufactures GPI and GPRO products to serve fuel, agriculture, chemical, construction, mining, oil and gas, and other core markets. GPI is a brand with a strong legacy of fuel, oil, and chemical transfer pumps and meters. GPRO is a brand of fuel transfer pumps and meters made exclusively for commercial applications that demand a more robust, professional grade design. Great Plains Industries got its start in 1968 in Wichita, Kansas. The company has grown into a 178,000 sq. ft. headquarters in northeast Wichita where it manufacturers all GPI and GPRO products. The company portfolio expanded in 2013 with the acquisition of FLOMEC flow meters. FLOMEC products are strategically manufactured in both Sydney, Australia and Wichita, KS facilities. All three product lines have overlap in serving key markets like agriculture and oil & gas. GPI and GPRO products are engineered and assembled at Great Plains Industries in Wichita, KS, USA. Customers can contact Great Plains Industries or locate a distributor partner via the following options. GPI and GPRO product lines are represented by a global network of valued distributors and retail partners. Sydney, Australia: www.GPIpumps.com.au | +61 2 9540 4433 Wichita, KS, USA: www.GreatPlainsIndustries.com | 1-888-996-3837 | [email protected]

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Avik Services, LLC.

undefined, St. Louis , Missouri , 63132, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Avik Services, LLC. is an industrial automation company based out of St. Louis, Missouri, United States. Avik exists to provide consultation, installation, integration, and training for intelligent material handling solutions. Our primary focus is providing excellent service for our customers through unparalleled experience with complex problems that arise in the material handling world. By working with leading vendors and manufacturers who offer unique and intelligent solutions in the warehouse automation space; we are able to provide advanced solutions to any of our customers’ biggest challenges. Each and every time we are privileged to be onsite at our customer’s distribution centers we view it as an opportunity to solidify our relationship with them as their preferred vendor. While onsite performing maintenance, installation and integration tasks we strive to work seamlessly with our clients and their teams and employ a “whatever it takes” attitude to ensure the work is done better, faster and smarter than the competition.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-plains-industries-inc-.jpeg
GPI / GPRO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avik-services-llc..jpeg
Avik Services, LLC.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GPI / GPRO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Avik Services, LLC.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPI / GPRO in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avik Services, LLC. in 2025.

Incident History — GPI / GPRO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPI / GPRO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Avik Services, LLC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avik Services, LLC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-plains-industries-inc-.jpeg
GPI / GPRO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avik-services-llc..jpeg
Avik Services, LLC.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Avik Services, LLC. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GPI / GPRO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Avik Services, LLC. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GPI / GPRO company.

In the current year, Avik Services, LLC. company and GPI / GPRO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Avik Services, LLC. company nor GPI / GPRO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Avik Services, LLC. company nor GPI / GPRO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Avik Services, LLC. company nor GPI / GPRO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GPI / GPRO company nor Avik Services, LLC. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GPI / GPRO nor Avik Services, LLC. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GPI / GPRO company nor Avik Services, LLC. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GPI / GPRO company employs more people globally than Avik Services, LLC. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither GPI / GPRO nor Avik Services, LLC. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GPI / GPRO nor Avik Services, LLC. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GPI / GPRO nor Avik Services, LLC. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GPI / GPRO nor Avik Services, LLC. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GPI / GPRO nor Avik Services, LLC. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GPI / GPRO nor Avik Services, LLC. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H