Comparison Overview

Great Gig Dance Co

VS

Voice One

Great Gig Dance Co

4200 Wade Green Road, Suite 128, kennesaw, GA, 30144, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.greatgigdance.com/

great gig DANCE co. is the Premier Dance Studio in Cobb County. Teaching Tap, Jazz, Lyrical, Hip-Hop, Modern and Ballet from ages 3 to 103. We offer facilities that feature 4 full size studios. We also offer dance classes for special needs students. At great gig DANCE co., we approach dance as an activity that can bring enrichment to many areas of your life. We believe that dance promotes self- discipline and helps children develop a feeling of integrity and pride in their accomplishments. Through dance, students learn to respect their peers and teachers, and acquire a sense of responsibility toward others. Studying dance and performing for an audience also provide an important foundation of confidence and self-esteem crucial to future success. By challenging both the mind and body, dance offers students a creative outlet and unparalleled physical training.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Voice One

414 Jackson St, San Francisco, California, 94111, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799
http://www.voiceone.com

Voice One offers a comprehensive training program to help you become a professional voice over actor, along with a state-of-the-art production facility for recording, editing and mixing audio projects. Established in 1986, Voice One has grown into two divisions that provide training and job opportunities in commercials, video games, audio books, industrials, and animation. With our experienced staff and unique approach, Voice One is the leader in San Francisco voiceover training, and helps you build a sustainable career.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-gig-dance-co.jpeg
Great Gig Dance Co
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voice-one-training.jpeg
Voice One
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Great Gig Dance Co
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Voice One
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Gig Dance Co in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voice One in 2025.

Incident History — Great Gig Dance Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Gig Dance Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Voice One (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voice One cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-gig-dance-co.jpeg
Great Gig Dance Co
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voice-one-training.jpeg
Voice One
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Great Gig Dance Co company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Voice One company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Voice One company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Great Gig Dance Co company.

In the current year, Voice One company and Great Gig Dance Co company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Voice One company nor Great Gig Dance Co company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Voice One company nor Great Gig Dance Co company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Voice One company nor Great Gig Dance Co company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co company nor Voice One company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co nor Voice One holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co company nor Voice One company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Voice One company employs more people globally than Great Gig Dance Co company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co nor Voice One holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co nor Voice One holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co nor Voice One holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co nor Voice One holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co nor Voice One holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Great Gig Dance Co nor Voice One holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References