Comparison Overview

Gray Becker, P.C.

VS

DSK Legal

Gray Becker, P.C.

900 West Ave., Austin, Texas, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For more than 30 years, Gray & Becker, P.C., has provided skillful representation for clients in complex legal matters. The firm has earned an acclaimed reputation, particularly for its accomplishments in litigation in diverse civil practice areas from business law to high-asset family law disputes. Our legal team consists of distinguished litigators, many of whom are recognized leaders in their fields. Building on the firm's cornerstones of excellence and experience, our legal practitioners boast a strong record of courtroom success. The firm's founders have tried hundreds of cases in state and federal court and have been selected for inclusion in Texas Super Lawyers. They are among the top business and family law litigators in Central Texas.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DSK Legal

1701, One World Centre, Tower 2B, Floor 17, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400013, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Full service law firm with offices in Mumbai, New Delhi, Bengaluru, and Pune. DSK Legal was established in April 2001 with the intent of delivering quality legal services at international standards across service lines relevant to business. The founder partners have immense experienced and are well reputed in the areas of corporate and commercial work, dispute resolution, real estate and indirect tax. Starting with 7 lawyers in 2001, we have rapidly grown with lawyers from diverse backgrounds, with multiple skill sets, and offices in Mumbai, New Delhi, Bengaluru, and Pune. We strive to maintain client relationship and have stayed with success in client satisfaction. We are conscious of client demands and are proactive to their needs. We also provide quick and practical responses, take ‘ownership’ of assignments to facilitate smooth and efficient completion and constantly strive to assist clients in achieving their goals. We follow procedures relating to client and matter acceptance and are conscious of avoiding both legal and business conflicts. We adhere to strict confidentiality standards to the extent of sharing information within our firm only on a “need to know” basis. We agree to our scope of services and fees in advance and maintain record time and expenses incurred on each assignment to achieve transparency.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 483
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gray-&-becker-p-c-.jpeg
Gray Becker, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gray Becker, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DSK Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gray Becker, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DSK Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Gray Becker, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gray Becker, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DSK Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DSK Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gray-&-becker-p-c-.jpeg
Gray Becker, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dsk-legal.jpeg
DSK Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DSK Legal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gray Becker, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DSK Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gray Becker, P.C. company.

In the current year, DSK Legal company and Gray Becker, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DSK Legal company nor Gray Becker, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DSK Legal company nor Gray Becker, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DSK Legal company nor Gray Becker, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. company nor DSK Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. nor DSK Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. company nor DSK Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DSK Legal company employs more people globally than Gray Becker, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. nor DSK Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. nor DSK Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. nor DSK Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. nor DSK Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. nor DSK Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. nor DSK Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X