Comparison Overview

GraphTec, Inc.

VS

GNU Group

GraphTec, Inc.

6209 Windfern Rd, Houston, 77040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

GraphTec, Inc. is a leading manufacturer of custom interior, exterior, architectural and environmental graphics. For nearly three decades, our in-house craftsmen have completed signage projects all over the nation, including value engineering, project management, and installation. We are active members of the Society for Environmental Graphic Design and the International Sign Association with countless resources and years of experience.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GNU Group

3478 Buskirk Ave, Pleasant Hill, 94523, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

For over 50 years, GNU Group has been helping people find their way by planning, designing and building possibilities through a human-centered design approach to experiential graphic design. We are experts in designing branded environments, architectural signage and wayfinding solutions across 9 different market segments. We execute assignments through Traditional Bid or Design Build format. Our areas of project expertise includes: - Corporate Workplace - Healthcare - Office - Education - Civic - Residential - Retail - Hotel/Hospitality - Donor Recognition

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphtec-inc.jpeg
GraphTec, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gnu-group.jpeg
GNU Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GraphTec, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GNU Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GraphTec, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GNU Group in 2025.

Incident History — GraphTec, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GraphTec, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GNU Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GNU Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphtec-inc.jpeg
GraphTec, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gnu-group.jpeg
GNU Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GraphTec, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GNU Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GNU Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GraphTec, Inc. company.

In the current year, GNU Group company and GraphTec, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GNU Group company nor GraphTec, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GNU Group company nor GraphTec, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GNU Group company nor GraphTec, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. company nor GNU Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. nor GNU Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. company nor GNU Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GNU Group company employs more people globally than GraphTec, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. nor GNU Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. nor GNU Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. nor GNU Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. nor GNU Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. nor GNU Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GraphTec, Inc. nor GNU Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X