Comparison Overview

Graphix For Change

VS

Blue Zoo Creative

Graphix For Change

56 Harvard St, Springfield, MA, 01109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

If your work is about making people's lives better, taking care of our planet, building communities, or educating our children and adults, we thank you and honor you for your work. Whether or not you've thought about it, you are doing social change work. And each change - no matter how small - completely changes the world!! We established Graphix for Change as a way to do our part to support this work in its many forms. Get in touch. We welcome your inquiries and would be happy to provide you with some ideas, information that you can use for grant proposals or other purposes, or an estimate for a specific project. Interested in how graphic design and marketing are being used to promote social change? Subscribe to our blog and sign up to receive our newsletter. We look forward to getting to know you better.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Blue Zoo Creative

1509 East Joyce #8474, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29

Blue Zoo Creative specializes in Branding, Web Design and Development, as well as Hosting with Ongoing Support to ensure your brand shines in local and national markets. Our tailored websites, SEO expertise, compelling branding, and engaging blogging are just a few of the tools we leverage to fuel your business growth. Join forces with us to drive your business to new heights.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphix-for-change.jpeg
Graphix For Change
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-zoo-creative.jpeg
Blue Zoo Creative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Graphix For Change
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blue Zoo Creative
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphix For Change in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Zoo Creative in 2025.

Incident History — Graphix For Change (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphix For Change cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blue Zoo Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Zoo Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphix-for-change.jpeg
Graphix For Change
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-zoo-creative.jpeg
Blue Zoo Creative
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Graphix For Change company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Blue Zoo Creative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blue Zoo Creative company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graphix For Change company.

In the current year, Blue Zoo Creative company and Graphix For Change company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blue Zoo Creative company nor Graphix For Change company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blue Zoo Creative company nor Graphix For Change company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blue Zoo Creative company nor Graphix For Change company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graphix For Change company nor Blue Zoo Creative company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graphix For Change nor Blue Zoo Creative holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Graphix For Change company nor Blue Zoo Creative company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Blue Zoo Creative company employs more people globally than Graphix For Change company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Graphix For Change nor Blue Zoo Creative holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Graphix For Change nor Blue Zoo Creative holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Graphix For Change nor Blue Zoo Creative holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Graphix For Change nor Blue Zoo Creative holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Graphix For Change nor Blue Zoo Creative holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Graphix For Change nor Blue Zoo Creative holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X